User talk:Radncat

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Valle de la Luna (Chile) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Valle de la Luna (Chile) was changed by Radncat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967855 on 2016-03-17T11:16:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Moon with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Gigantosaurus with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 11:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Radncat

Hello Radncat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Radncat for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Carbinga (talk) 11:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hipose

Hello Radncat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hipose for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Carbinga (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Illuminati ‎. Sjö (talk) 12:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Radncat adncat

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Radncat adncat, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Everymorning (talk) 12:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 12:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]