User talk:Radmap

Welcome!

Hello, Radmap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Sorry, but I redirected your Ohio LIDAR article to the parent article, so to speak, National LIDAR Dataset - USA. The Ohio article is not likely to be independently notable (that doesn't mean it's not important, mind you), but the nationwide one is, and I would urge you to direct your energy to that particular article, which needs some help. Again, thank you for your contributions. Drmies (talk) 04:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I believe that the Maryland article needs redirecting also. This has some content, and merging it (see WP:MERGE) will help make the US article nice and plump. The problem with the Maryland article, as with Ohio, is that there are no independent sources, and there aren't likely to be so many that WP:N is met; that shouldn't be a problem for the national article. Drmies (talk) 04:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio LIDAR Availability listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ohio LIDAR Availability. Since you had some involvement with the Ohio LIDAR Availability redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 16:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strelka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illumina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strelka

Please note that disambiguation pages like Strelka are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 11:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]