User talk:Radicalmember

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

IrishGuy ^talk 22:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Radicalmember (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't get it. Why?

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppet of Toweepformenot. — Yamla 22:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are a sock of Toweepformenot‎ evading your block. IrishGuy ^talk 22:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true. I looked for any sort of evidence in my contributions, and I have to say that there's none. Would you mind enlightening me? Radicalmember 22:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could, but I see no reason to tip you off to make more efficient socks. Any admin who wants more information can simply ask me. IrishGuy ^talk 22:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, this is bogus. I did nothing wrong. I haven't even made a single edit to anything other than my userpage (which you unwarrentedly changed). I demand you remove this block unless you can show me that I did something wrong. Radicalmember 22:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't care less what you demand. Stop evading your block with socks. IrishGuy ^talk 22:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) You are confirmed as a sockpuppet of Toweepformenot. The evidence is categorical and has been reviewed by multiple admins. --Yamla 22:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This just isn't right. What about always assuming good faith? I'm new, but I know this isn't the way banning should be handled. I may be under evalution for vandalism by other users of this school's IP address, but I am certain, as my contributions will back up, that I have not done anything wrong. Radicalmember 22:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We have specific evidence, reviewed by multiple admins, that you are a sockpuppet. We know this for a fact. Page protected, you are done trolling. --Yamla 22:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]