User talk:RacingSunset

November 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Kendra Adams, from its old location at User:RacingSunset/sandbox/Kendra Adams. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 15:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kendra Adams (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kendra Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 15:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! RacingSunset, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 15:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kendra Adams (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kendra Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kendra Adams wonderama.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Kendra Adams wonderama.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

Please also consider updating other files you created or uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kendra Adams (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:CIRCULAR.We need major independent reliable sources discussing the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kendra Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 15:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kendra Adams kendrawiki.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kendra Adams kendrawiki.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Train2104 (t • c) 02:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Draft:Kendra Adams. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Toddst1 - This account does NOT belong to Kendra Adams. I am doing up this page ABOUT Kendra Adams, but I am not her. This is not an autobiography. I haven't had time to work on this, and wikipedia is a new adventure/hobby for me, and I am learning as I go. Kendra Adams is a very interesting topic and what she has accomplished by herself as a young girl is impressive.

I had put this on hold for many months, being busy with other things. Kendra knows that I am working on this as I've gathered a lot of information from her as well as online. She forwarded an email to me today that she received from Tamsinsemkelly@gmail.com who claimed they were an experienced Wikipendian and they stated they would rewrite the content, format the draft to Wikipedia standards and get the page approved by Wikipedia. However, they didn't know that Kendra is not the owner of this account, and wanted her to forward them $250 to do this. It's discouraging that this offer was turned down, and then today I decided to log on and work on it in some time I had tonight, only to find a message making it sound like the page would be deleted.

I know that I don't know how to do a Wikipedia page, I know that I have a lot to learn, but it has been a great learning experience for me. I am almost 50 years old and I am not a techy person, so working on this when I have some time, and HOPING to one day get approval, especially for this young girl that inspires so many, is my goal. It's a long process for me as every time I think I have it right, after I fix what I've been told needs to be fixed, I get a new message to fix something else.

I've formatted this page after other race car drivers that have a Wikipedia and have tried to write the information in the same format, but clearly, I keep getting it wrong. It's a work in progress for me, something I am enjoying, learning new things, yet sometimes frustrating. Sometimes the language about changes is foreign to me as, again, I am not techy, and sometimes when I would like a helping hand, I am not sure how to get help.

So to clear this up, I am NOT Kendra Adams, this is NOT an autobiography, and this is something that I am working on myself. It feels bad that someone tried to get Kendra to pay them money to complete this today, and then tonight, there was a message from you, and I feel like this is going to be deleted. I know that some people would do one of these in a very short time, but I have spend countless hours trying very hard to get this right. Would be very disappointing if it was deleted. Your consideration to allow me to continue learning and working on this would be appreciated. Thank you, Kelly RacingSunset (talk) 00:17, 21 July 2017 RacingSunset (talk) 00:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kendra Adams concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kendra Adams, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]