User talk:RabAllan

December 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Glasvegas, you will be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Glasvegas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Glasvegas, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sceptre ^(talk) 04:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Glasvegas. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. JD554 (talk) 10:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary for this edit (diff) would suggest that you are trying to identify yourself as the Rab Allan who is a member of the band. --JD554 (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to It's My Own Cheating Heart That Makes Me Cry. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

12 hour block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 08:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Glasvegas, you will be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 21:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/RabAllan. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Your username and edits suggest that you are the Rab Allan mentioned in the Glasvegas. While this is possible we have no prove for that. Therefore I am forced to block this account for the time being. Please follow the instuctions on Wikipedia:USERNAME#Real_names to get yourselves unblocked. Agathoclea (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note to unblocking admin: please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/RabAllan and reduce block to incorporate 1 month block. Agathoclea (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.