User talk:Raaj thakur.999

May 2022

Hello, I'm Aman.kumar.goel. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 05:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Krack (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 05:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of most expensive Indian films, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [1], [2] etc. Ab207 (talk) 09:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Darbar (film). Ab207 (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sye Raa Narasimha Reddy. Ab207 (talk) 09:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raaj thakur.999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a movie lover . I keep all correct and accurate informations about movies like :- budget , box office collections , impact, controversy and especially the brief reasons behind good or bad performance of a movie , or its historical accuracy , if it is based on a true event from history . Respected administration of wikipedia and other editors may not have liked the editing and corrections of the theory of some movies, but I have accurate sources of data which prove my corrections . For example :- when I did a correction in the list of "highest budget INDIAN movies" , I made Robot 2.0 on rank 1 with a budget of 570 and RRR with a budget of 550 crore on rank 2 . I have accurate proofs and links of the sources where the makers have themselves revealed the budget . One of the editor send me a warning to not to edit this. I sent him link of TRUSTABLE SOURCE (zee news , Google etc etc ) , even after that he didn't replied and gave me warning . Same happened when I edited about movie "SYE RAA NARASIMHA REDDY" where I wrote that " Movie flopped in the Hindi belt because of its theatrical clash with WAR . I have accurate proofs where the makers and movie analysts said this fact themselves. I hope you have understood what I wanted to say. WIKIPEDIA is a great source of taking information . I Just want to make wikipedia a more better platform to get information. I have not done any immature correction like editing the cast or crew name or changing it . No , I haven't edited even a single word without accurate proofs . I have evidences to justify all my corrections, atleast from a great number of trusted and reputable websites . Hope the team will remark my concern and take their decision accordingly. I trust team wikipedia and will accept the final decision by them . Thank you. Raaj_thakur.999

Decline reason:

None of this really addresses the reason for the block, your persistent addition of unsourced content. If you have sources for your information, you need to provide them with your edits(see WP:REFB if you need instructions for this). Wikipedia is not a place to merely provide information- we must have sources. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.