User talk:RYSTER DCD

July 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 03:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But he has moved to Dortmund it’s on their Instagram? I changed his club to Dortmund I’m confused? RYSTER DCD (talk) 11:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because... (your reason here)

We created a joke of our friend who plays for the Hadleigh Brett’s and we had no intention of it showing negative behaviour. I would like to request to have it back and I won’t put that picture or any negative remarks on there anymore --RYSTER DCD (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some reading for you: Wikipedia:User_pages#What_may_I_not_have_in_my_user_pages?. Please don't write about your friends/enemies on Wikipedia, whether it's in articles or your userpage. That's not the purpose of Wikipedia. Let an admin delete that page entirely so the page history is not visible, then you can have your userpage back. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 03:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jude Bellingham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 11:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Timo Werner. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 19:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sergio Ramos, you may be blocked from editing. Bmf 051 (talk) 22:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sergio Ramos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kante4 (talk) 10:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ mazca ^talk 21:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kylian Mbappé. Code Pending (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are the only two meme edits I have ever made. I went to remove the Mbappe straight after I put it but it was already taken down. I have made tons of constructive edits in the past and this one action shouldn’t ban me permanently RYSTER DCD (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the first page of your contributions I can count at least four 'meme edits' as you describe them. [1][2][3][4]. You definitely have done a selection of small constructive edits, but I don't think this reflects well on you. Reverting your own edits does not change the fact that you're repeatedly vandalising Wikipedia. If I were to unblock you, will you agree to completely not do this in future? ~ mazca ^talk 22:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will 100% not vandalise in the future. I’ve always liked editing players when they have played a match or moved club and I will continue to do so responsibly RYSTER DCD (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you in good faith. No more joke edits please, even if you remove them afterwards - there will not be another chance. Happy editing. ~ mazca ^talk 09:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gylfi Sigurðsson, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.