User talk:RSekulovich
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, RSekulovich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Jpeob 04:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
{{helpme}} A few problems, easily enough resolved I'm sure by one more experienced than me:
- The image in wikimedia without documentation Image:NicolasBeaujon a 1785.jpg has been superseded by one with the proper copyright info and ought to be erased, I just don't know how.
Thanks for your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by RSekulovich (talk • contribs) 16:38, 3 Jan 2008
- Hi,
- 1) The image will be deleted on January 6th as it has no copyright status. So you don't need to worry about that.
- 2) The Joseph_Pellerin article seems to still be orphaned, but that is my opinion, if you wish to you can remove it, non-administrators can remove tags, to do so simply edit the article and remove the tag like you did. However, as I am typing this I have noticed that another user has already removed it!
- Hope this helps! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) 16:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
WOW that was quick!
thanks!
- Welcome to Wikipedia! I will start with the article as it is the easeyest one. Anyone (including unregistered users) are allowed to remove that tag, you can do it by going into edit mode on the page (click edit this page) and remove the {{orphan|date=December 2007}} from it. Don't worry if you do something wrong on wikipedia, editor [should] follow a policy of assume good faith and are understanding of editors who have not been around long.
On the image front - other users would find it hard to fix for you until you have specified some things. First of all - Where did you get the image from? When you post the answer, you can replace the helpme tag.Read your question wrong, sorry. Just a quick note about messages - when you post on a talk page, you should sign your messages with ~~~~ because, as by magic, it is converted into your user name and is time stamped. If you have anymore problems, feel free to place another helpme or contact me on my talk page. Tiddly-Tom 16:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
got it! RSekulovich 17:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Is there a way to find out how many and which pages link TO an article?
Thanks! RSekulovich 17:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, Absolutly. When you go to an article, or this page in fact you will see a box called 'Toolbox' on the left. If you click on 'What Links Here', you will have a list of all the pages containing links to the page you are on. Don't forget the ~~~~ Tiddly-Tom 17:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! RSekulovich 20:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Disgruntled wiki editor comment
[edit]Hi. Why did you re-insert the long not-wikified text at the Arnaud II de La Porte comment? The text once was inserted by an anonymous user with the remark "add translation from the French of a longer biographical essay (dated 1818, copyright expired; two texts to be integrated later". Because I didnot see the point of keeping two biographies on the same person on the same article, I placed the essay on the talk-page. Thus, the readers can read the better text, and the editors still can use the essay in their edits. Please tell me what is wrong with that.
By the way, those essays could be better placed at Wikisource[1]Jeff5102 (talk) 07:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I plan to integrate the two longish bios into one tighter one, give me a few days ok?
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, RSekulovich. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RSekulovich. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RSekulovich. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Link between Thomas of Lancaster and "De Langlée Family".
[edit]Hello @RSekulovich, In 2009, you wrote in Thomas of Lancaster page : "The noble de Langlée family of France claimed him for their ultimate ancestor." "De Langlée" family are my ancestors and I would have some information about this link. Have you a source about ? Best regards 193.52.40.238 (talk) 12:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)