User talk:RSJ1973

==Recent edit to Luton Airport==\n Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Luton Airport without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kev ^(talk) 07:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RSJ1973, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi RSJ1973! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gatwick Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Gatwick Airport page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zürich Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ch/flughafen-1.5424878 | work = Neue Zürcher Zeitung | title = «Flughafen Zürich» statt «Unique»] | language = German | trans_title = "Zurich airport" instead of "Unique" | date = 12 April 2010 |
name="tickets.vueling.com">http://tickets.vueling.com/ScheduleSelect.aspx</ref>, [[London-Luton]] (begins 12 Junes 2016, [[Málaga Airport|Málaga]], [[Leonardo da Vinci-Fiumicino Airport|Rome-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lanzarote Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did try to add the "reliable source" you so often like to talk about to the new route to Lanzarote but for some unknown reason it failed to add ! I will be more careful in future but maybe you need to calm down a little and stop dishing out these unwarrented threats.

Reliable sources are required by policies, not by me. I will cool down once you start adding references.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RSJ1973. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RSJ1973. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to San Carlos de Bariloche Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 03:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Moscow Domodedovo Airport, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrewgprout (talk) 08:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gran Canaria Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Andrewgprout (talk) 00:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andrew - I completed the edit to the Gran Canaria Airport page because these references were no longer relevant for the scheduled flights. I did not deem this to be vandalism or disruptive behaviour but merely an attempt at removing out of date material that no longer bears any relevance. I have looked closely at the policy with regards to removing this type of material and can not see anything that’s states otherwise but am happy to be corrected. Best regards RSJ1973

June 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Luton_Airport. Thank you. Andrewgprout (talk) 00:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help with other people

Hi! On Katowice Airport's site Katowice International Airport you can see someone wants tochange refs. But after his edit, refs are broke! Could you help me? I don't know what to do with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filips3 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RSJ1973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible CoI

Hello, RSJ1973. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.SovalValtos (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply to this CoI query. You stated in an edit summary "Vueling we’ll continue to operate the Amsterdam service" which suggests you could have some connection.SovalValtos (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]