User talk:RPinney331

RAM Superchargers

I believe that you have mistaken a brand name (the e-RAM supercharger) for a generic name for this type of device. There are other electric superchargers on the market (for example, the Thorton, the device made by Thomas Knight, etc.) I don't believe your article provides any substantial updates in information than what is available on the Supercharger page. I would propose either merging your page to the Supercharger page, but that would leave a redirect that really isn't appropriate, as the very name of the article itself promotes one brand of electric supercharger over other brands. Unless you can correct my assumptions, I will have to nominate your article for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. rather than delete the page, I have merely reworded it to say "electric supercharger" instead of "RAM supercharger" and I have moved the page to Electric supercharger.

Poker Chips (website)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Poker Chips (website), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.pokerchipsonline.com/help/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poker Chips (website)

A tag has been placed on Poker Chips (website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Easel

Your recent addition of a link to Easel has been reverted. If you had added extra information to the article that was provided by that site, it might have been appropriate, but since no information was added, only the extra link, this is considered link spam, and is inappropriate. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I tried to edit the page but there was no option to edit the main text, only the references. I just assumed that it was appropriate since it was relevant. The reference I added was backing up the fact that most easels are made of wood, aluminum, and steel.

The option to edit the main page is at the top of the page (it's one of the tabs across the top of any article): it says "edit this page". However (see note below), your choice of references is questionable. Please refer to WP:RS to understand what Wikipedia considers reliable sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link spam

Reviewing your edit history, it appears that you are determined to add references and external links to articles that don't seem appropriate (such as here and here and here). Such edits are inappropriate, as they are considered link spam. Please avoid this type of editing in the future. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding link spam references. Refer to WP:RS to understand the meaning of reliable sources. Specifically, a website intent on selling swords to collectors may not be the most reliable source of information about swords, but it does amount to link spam. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies on the Sword article. The site does look like a seller's site. In reality, it is a single hobbyist spouting what he knows about swords. This still falls far short of the standards of a reliable source. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Apologies. You may have been directed to ask for feedback at WP:FEED or perhaps you found that page on your own. As a result of very strong usage of Wikipedia:Article wizard 2.0, the number of requests for feedback has increased ten-fold, from less than one a day, to over ten a day, and staffing isn't up to the task. I'm trying to solicit new help, but it may take some time.--SPhilbrick T 23:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've left feedback for you here. Thanks for making your contribution to wikipedia! :) JoeSmack ^Talk 16:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]