User talk:RPekař
Welcome
[edit]
|
4meter4 (talk) 20:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
New categories
[edit]Hi. Please don't create categories for things that have only a few members. Please see this guideline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Overcategorization#Small_with_no_potential_for_growth Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, I won't then. But even before I started, more than half of the existing subcategories under "Operas by composer" had one or two members: I thought that was the accepted standard. The rule you refer to mentiones "Songs by artists" as an accepted exception, the opera categorisation seems completely analogous to me. As a user, I would find it very useful to have a list of Wikipedia opera articles by author, for which purpose categorisation seemed the best tool for me.RPekař (talk) 09:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Well, the guideline says not to do it unless there is a "large scheme" already set up for categories in the topic area. As you say, some opera composers already were catted like this, even if they only composed a few operas. I left a query over at the Categories for discussion talk page, and opinion is mixed. Generally, I don't think it's a good idea for one editor to make category changes that affect multiple articles without discussing it first with the relevant project, in this case WP:OPERA. I asked the question over there, and at lease one editor didn't mind what you had done, so I guess it's no big deal (I see you also posted over there). Personally, though, I don't see how it helps. If I am looking for Beethoven's only opera, but I can't remember the name, I can just look at his article, and there will be a link. It seems to me the category tree would be cleaner if it only contained subcats that had, say, more than half a dozen members. But, in any case, I think it is worth asking first, before going ahead with a project like this. Sorry if I overreacted. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, no offence taken. I honestly thought I just followed a standard already established, that's why I hadn't thought of asking.RPekař (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Even so, whenever I do anything that will affect a large number of articles (more than 3?) I try to poke around a little and see if the people editing in that topic area have a problem with my plan. Sometimes they have already discussed the idea and have a good reason not to do it. If I don't see any reason to wait, then I go ahead. Just my 2 cents. Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just wanted to to thank you RPekař for your very useful help in improving the opera categories. If you are interested in editing opera articles, you may want to consider joining us at WP:WikiProject Opera. I have placed a welcome template below as well to help get you more acclamaited to wikipedia. Welcome!4meter4 (talk) 20:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. Ssilvers has, however, a valid point that I should not have started before discussion. I am active in the field of opera in my own (Czech) language version, which needs much more work on than this one, but I will certainly follow the "mother" Wikipedia.RPekař (talk) 20:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Just another note to say that everyone at the Opera Project has now confirmed that what you were doing was right, so I was wrong, and I apologize. Please do go ahead with it, as 4meter4 suggested. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, RPekař. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, RPekař. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RPekař. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RPekař. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)