User talk:RLaTou

Welcome!

Hi RLaTou! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Exhibition view, Mono No Ma, Gardiner Museum, Toronto, 2013.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Exhibition view, Mono No Ma, Gardiner Museum, Toronto, 2013.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Exhibition view, Mono No Ma, Gardiner Museum, Toronto, 2013.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Exhibition view, Mono No Ma, Gardiner Museum, Toronto, 2013.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:White Dwarf, 2012, An Te Liu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:White Dwarf, 2012, An Te Liu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Title Deed, 2009, An Te Liu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Title Deed, 2009, An Te Liu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jerszy Seymour Orsimanirana1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jerszy Seymour Orsimanirana1.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 11:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for your help.

I am currently checking with the source of the image for proper copyright attribution. The image is owned by Jerszy Seymour Design Workshop but is copyrighted by a Hamburg photographer listed in the metadata. Sorry for confusion.

Very best, Rodney LaTourelle RLaTou (talk) 07:54, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:1 La-Duree Install 1200 120 1200.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:1 La-Duree Install 1200 120 1200.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An Te Liu

Hello, RLaTou. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page An Te Liu, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marchjuly,

Thanks kindly for this reminder. I absolutely believe in the autonomy of Wikipedia from promotional and commercial interests. I am a writer, critic, academic with a research focus on the intersection between art and architecture and have noticed that many important inter-diciplinary practitioners are not included on Wikipedia. My aim is to add my expertise in this area to Wikipedia.

Best, RLatou RLaTou (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but none of that doesn't necessary mean that neither WP:COI nor WP:PAID aren't applicable to your situation. You need step out of yourself and self-assess whether they do because you can find yourself starting to have problems with others if your editing seems to indicate that they might. You might also want to take a careful look at WP:EXPERT for reference. Content experts are most welcome, but they're not given carte blanche to do as they please. Content experts who mistakenly assume their knowledge makes them exempt from needing to follow Wikipedia's various policies and guidelines are often seen as being WP:NOTHERE and end up running into problems as a result. Finally, while I did respond to your question at MCQ, so did another user named Ww2censor. A question may sometimes be responded to by multiple people and it's generally a good idea to address your replies accordingly when responding to someone's response. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your points are noted and I am following your links and advice, thanks. RLaTou (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jerszy Seymour

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jerszy Seymour, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You really do come across as having a conflict of interest. That's fine, but requires a different method of editing (use draft space and submit for review), and also requires disclosure. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ~Anachronist (talk),

Thanks for your info, I am a researcher and teacher working in the field of art and architecture and my intention is to to add significant practitioners that are not included in Wikipedia that I have studied, written about and have some expertise on. I don't have too much experience with Wiki editing but do have art expertise to offer. I tried to make the Seymour page neutral and similar to other artist pages. I will follow your advice and submit a page through the draft space for review and include disclosure of course. I have written about Jerszy Seymour previously and did teach with him 7 years ago so have met him. I realize this could make for a non-biased view but I am not paid or doing promotion work and focusing on the facts which are already found online. Are there specific parts of the page that I submitted that I should not include? I feel my expertise makes me more able to write about the subject- Thanks for your help, RLaTou RLaTou (talk) 09:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor having expertise in a subject, while helpful, is actually irrelevant on Wikipedia. The reason an editor's expertise is irrelevant is because we are required to rely on significant coverage in reliable independent sources for all information in an article. The expertise should already be represented in those sources.

Therefore, when writing an article, one doesn't first write the prose and then find sources to support it. That's backward. Instead, one collects the sources first (making sure they comply with requirements in WP:Golden rule), then you write the article based on what those sources say. Expertise in a topic isn't required for that. The only expertise really needed is the ability to identify reliable sources, distill information from those sources, and write in a detached neutral manner. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ~Anachronist,

Yes this is the process I went through: I looked for all the sources and then based any writing on this. All the writing is referenced to specific sources. I describe the practice in general similar to other articles and then went through his themes with listed projects. There are many sources listed in the wiki page. I am just wondering why the article does not sound neutral since the information comes from credited sources. Please let me know if you can suggest further editing. Thanks! RLaTou (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The expertise and familiarity with the subject help to find which sites to look for and which sources are more credible. RLaTou (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]