User talk:RJGiel
RJGiel, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi RJGiel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC) |
Conversation concerning one of the pages you created, continued from my talk page.
[edit]PREVIOUS MESSAGE:
Hi Adotchar,
It appears the page about SIRE Life Sciences needs more citations and promotional/advertising content. Is there any advice you could give on improving this article?
I tried to write the article in an objective manner, but I can understand if this is still too subjective.
I had a look at the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talent_Technology as it is a similair company.
Any help would be much appreciated!
Best regards,
Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJGiel (talk • contribs) 10:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
About this. Firstly, there are to be no promotional or advertising content on Wikipedia. Ever. See WP:NOTADVERTISING Also, to improve the article, get someone other than yourself who knows about it, and is not involved with the company. An example of the problems are 'What started as a small office in the heart of Amsterdam,[2] SIRE Life Sciences quickly grew to a company with 70+ employees' You need to be able to reference it, and make it sound more neutral. Also, if you're going to say they make over 10 million USD a year, put some evidence in there that actually matters, not the advertisement page, where all the reviews are written by employees. Also, remember to sign your posts with four of these ~
Thanks, Adotchar (talk) 10:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of SIRE Life Sciences for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SIRE Life Sciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIRE Life Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shritwod (talk) 16:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)