User talk:RIfoodie

Cyd McKenna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cyd McKenna, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:14, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dee Dee Witman

The article Dee Dee Witman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SIGCOV or WP:NPOL notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Dee Dee Witman— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 21:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was a bit fast there, and I reverted my edit. Dan Koehl (talk) 21:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I was trying to adhere to the process by adding more sources and improving the page as the template requested.--RIfoodie (talk) 21:40, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dee Dee Witman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dee Dee Witman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dee Dee Witman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmertel23 (talk) 15:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]