User talk:RGomc

This is RGomc's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What establishes notability is museum collections or major art reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RGomc/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RGomc, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RGomc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel and Geo Fuchs (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

May be notable, but inline citations to WP:Reliable sources are needed. Please see WP:Referencing for beginners

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel and Geo Fuchs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi, the references need to be inline citations with a References section not web links section, all references should be in the same section whether they are newspapers, books, or websites. I didn't mean your weblinks were unreliable but they need to be properly formatted with inline citations and also more references are needed so that every fact can be checked by the reader in the references. Help with inline citations is given in the WP:Referencing for beginners section. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk),

- Hi, will do a review tomorrow, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, will do some more minor changes later on and then when its ready ask you to resubmit it then I'll review it, that will be quite a bit later tonight, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very muchRGomc (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- - Hi, can you please resubmit. The article is good and I will approve but references 20 to 31 need to be moved inline next to the information that they are about, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will do...Thanks alot for all your help, very much appreciated!!!!RGomc (talk) 23:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel and Geo Fuchs has been accepted

Daniel and Geo Fuchs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]