User talk:RGB EN

Image copyright problem with Image:Manto 84 rektoratas 2.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Manto 84 rektoratas 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Manto 84 rektoratas 2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Manto 84 rektoratas 2.JPG. The copy called Image:Manto 84 rektoratas 2.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 21:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RGB EN! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 12 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Vladas Žulkus - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Vasilijus Safronovas

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Vasilijus Safronovas. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasilijus Safronovas. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Nu, welcome to Wikipedia. I have nothing to do with anything official. As you may have noticed, new contributors have become less welcome lately. Vistiek, I hope you will continue to contribute. Viso gero, Novickas (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone who wants to contribute in good faith is welcome and even if articles become the subject of deletion debates, we are well able to distinguish the editor from the article. That articles can be nominated for deletion and that they are discussed robustly is a part of Wikipedia. Many editors have had articles debated, including me. Hopefully the experience makes us better contributors and not offended ex-contributors! Welcome to Wikipedia...hope you enjoy the ride! Wikipeterproject (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]