User talk:REMEDYJANE

You need to read our guidance on conflict of interest and fringe topics. I understand that you sincerely believe that homeopathy is valid, scientific and all the rest, but the scientific consensus is that you are simply wrong, and no outcome from homeopathy has ever been convincingly shown to be inconsistent with the scientific explanation of nonspecific causes such as observer biases, expectation effects, natural course of disease, regression to the mean etc. If you try to use Wikipedia to advocate for homeopathy your time here will be short and frustrating. There is a pretty solid scientific consensus that it is implausible nonsense, and Wikipedia reflects the scientific view in areas of legitimate scientific inquiry. I think it's commendable that you are honest about your business, which is making money out of sick people. It's just a shame that you choose to do this using fraudulent nonsense like homeopathy. Guy (Help!) 15:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)