User talk:REDSUN75

Welcome on my talk page.
Please, place a new disscussion on the bottom of this page, give it a title and sign off with ~~~~. Thank you!

Oh My Girl

The "better article" you requested has been repeatedly removed from the Dutch Wikipedia. For good reason I assume. Also, do not pester other users about creating that article. It will not happen. Kleuske (talk) 13:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of User:Liefernando75. Stifle (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

REDSUN75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to ask for unblocking and at the same time apologize for vandalism. REDSUN75 (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

REDSUN75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to ask for unblocking and at the same time apologize for vandalism because I want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia. REDSUN75 (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is sockpuppetry, but you do not address that in this request. You should request unblock from your original account. 331dot (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Liefernando1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liefernando1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]