User talk:RECIDIVIS7
Welcome!
[edit]Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Doug Weller talk 17:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Sources for Gadsden flag
[edit]Which mention "negative liberty", whatever that is? The author of the Shondaland piece is "Matthew M. F. Miller is a freelance writer and author of Dad’s Guide to Pregnancy For Dummies". He surely doesn't meet our criteria at WP:RS and WP:VERIFY. Is one demonstrator enough to source the text?[1]. I'd say no. That leaves the tv station.
But the main problem isn't sources, since I think those can be found. The main problem is the "lead" which should be a summary of the main points of the article, see WP:LEAD. The article has 7 sections on modern uses, none of them mention individualism or of course negative liberty. So it doesn't belong in the lead at all. Doug Weller talk 17:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
New message from Doug Weller
[edit]Message added 18:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.