User talk:RDT2

Hi

--Yunipo 14:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary definitions at Matrix

The word etymology information you added to Matrix is certainly interesting, but unfortunately it does not belong on a disambiguation page. The disambiguation page links to Wiktionary, which would be a more appropriate place for the information. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions about disambiguation pages. -- Nataly a 15:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible typos?

In reference to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_stress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_strain

Are you sure "i.e the normal stress σ33 and the shear stresses σ12 and σ23 (if the thickness is the 3-direction)" shouldnt read "i.e the normal stress σ33 and the shear stresses σ13 and σ23 (if the thickness is the 3-direction)"?

Likewise, "i.e the normal strain ε33 and the shear strains ε12 and ε23 (if the length is the 3-direction)" -> "i.e the normal strain ε33 and the shear strains ε13 and ε23 (if the length is the 3-direction)"?

LochVoil 14:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Go ahead and change it.RDT2 12:47, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Symmetry of Stress Tensor

Could you please add a good reference for the possibility of a non symmetric stress tensor in the Stress_(physics) article? As you are probably aware there are a huge amount of sources giving "proofs" that the stress tensor is always symmetric, no matter what the situation. These range from explicit assumptions of zero moments, to nonsense, to outright browbeating. Sometimes by otherwise quite reputable sources. A good reference to the contrary would really make the Wikipedia article an authoritative source.

193.1.100.105 18:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reference to Fung in the 'body moments' link.RDT2 11:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy

Thank you for your correction-work on the Article above.

Yours truly, --Ludvikus 13:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Armor Backing

RDT2 please take a look at the discussion page on the Ballistic vest. Perhaps I could have your input... Bodyarmor (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Body moment

What's the difference between this and moment of inertia? Any reason why the two shouldn't be merged/redirected?Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 06:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RDT2! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Fraser Speirs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jim Mullen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RDT2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]