User talk:RCSB

{{PDFlink}} works differently from its previous incarnations which was an image and link to the PDF page. But now, the template places a span wrapper around the first unnamed parameter ({{{1}}}) and has a second parameters for the file size. The span wrapper has class="PDFlink" (see MediaWiki:common.css) which overrides the background image on the hyper-link. This feature, however, is only useful for Internet Explorer 5-6 Users as newer browsers support the advanced CSS selectors that adds the icon to external links containing .pdf.

I also run a bot that attempts to convert the old format to the new format, while adding file size information. The bot runs four times a week on Category:PDFlink without a parameter and once a month on all transclusions of PDFlink. —Dispenser 04:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you sleep at night?

I hope you feel ashamed about your disgraceful slandering of poor innocent Rachman. 86.150.30.172 11:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out Gideo himself did make such a claim!

You're right - I thought I'd actually add your reference to his opening statement on his blog and see where this goes :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimam (talk • contribs) 14:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstood Gideon: He wrote his blog post before I corrected the entry. The original entry claimed that his last job at The Economist was Charlemagne. He meant to say that although he was indeed Charlemagne - this wasn't his last position at The Economist. But I am guessing you read his blog post after I had already corrected it (adding that he was also business editor - his last job). Therefore, you mistakenly surmised that he was referring to the corrected version as being incorrect. RCSB 14:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but why haven't you replied to my message yet? 86.150.30.172 18:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:E-V bomb-testing.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:E-V bomb-testing.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]