User talk:RCFrancis

Welcome!

Hello, RCFrancis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 05:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copper Canyon Press

Are you aware that Sam Hamil is no longer at the press? Any material you add to the article must be sourced according to WP:V and WP:RS and not sound promotional. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 22:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ellen Bass

The article Ellen Bass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no reliable sources, does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hellno2 (talk) 23:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Lee (poet)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of David Lee (poet), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.entradainstitute.org/about_david_lee.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I appreciate your removing text from this source from the article. I have also removed text from [1]. Wikipedia can only publish previously published text if it is either verifiably public domain or licensed compatibly with our own license (see our copyright policy). If you are by chance the previous publisher, you do have the option of donating the text. The procedure for this can be found at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not, but have permission from the publisher, you can verify this through the process set out at WP:Permissions. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:12, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Gerber

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dan Gerber, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lib.msu.edu/services/spec_coll/writer/MWCDanGerber.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Gerber

A tag has been placed on Dan Gerber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That article was a copyvio of the several website you cited. You cannot just take a paragraph from website 1, a sentence from website 2, etc., and claim that it was not a copyright violation - it was, of both sites. It took me a while to clean up the article, during which time it has been (correctly) speedily deleted. Please note that persistent copyright violators may be blocked from editing. Tim Song (talk) 03:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Lindsay

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sarah Lindsay, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.coppercanyonpress.org/catalog/dsp_author.cfm?Book_ID=1330. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Lindsay

A tag has been placed on Sarah Lindsay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 00:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Davis (poet)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jon Davis (poet), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.iaia.edu/college/_1jondavis.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of poets

List of poets is a list of notable poets (i.e. poets who already have a Wikipedia article. Please make sure that there is an article before you add poets to that list. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Nichols (poet)

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Travis Nichols (poet), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.versedaily.org/2011/abouttravisnicholssmi.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Travis Nichols (poet)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Travis Nichols (poet) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 21:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Travis Nichols

The article Travis Nichols has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims that would satisfy the WP:AUTHOR requirement for notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 23:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Copper Canyon Press, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dean Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copper Canyon

Hi, I notice that many of your edits are to Copper Canyon Press or adding links to Copper Canyon's website to pages about poets published by the press. Are you by any chance affiliated with Copper Canyon? If so, I would strongly recommend that you disclose this connection and review Wikipedia's policies on conflict of interest. Cheers, Tdslk (talk) 00:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have continued to edit the pages of poets affiliated with Copper Canyon. As it appears to me that you have an undeclared conflict of interest, I have reported you to the [noticeboard]. Tdslk (talk) 22:47, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Copper Canyon Press, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Richardson, Independent and Bill Porter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You need to explain removals of sourced content

Please stop removing sourced content from Copper Canyon Press without providing a valid reason. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:06, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women writers Invitation

Hello RCFrancis! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RCFrancis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RCFrancis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Clemens Starck) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Clemens Starck, RCFrancis!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please be careful about close paraphrasing. You should express the information in the source in your own words and not copy/paste sentences into your article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

I have been blocked based on Clemens Starck's page that I have created. I pasted or copied nothing from any of the external references. Obviously I used information from each of the references however there were no copy/paste sentences. The same is true for the Rachel McKibbens page that I wrote earlier in the summer. I would like more detail on why the Starck page is blocked and why the McKibbens page has been scalped of all content. I am certainly willing to make any adjustments to the pages to clear up these problems. Thanks for your help. Bob Francis

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachel McKibbens

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rachel McKibbens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rachelmckibbens.com/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hitro talk 09:40, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your addition to Rachel McKibbens has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Hitro talk 09:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Rachel McKibbens

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Rachel McKibbens, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.rachelmckibbens.com/about.html http://tedxflourcity.com/?q=speaker/2013/rachel-mckibbens https://www.coppercanyonpress.org/pages/browse/author.asp?ag=%7B46DB75E0-932A-4391-9387-0C92A7E367FE%7D, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Rachel McKibbens and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Rachel McKibbens, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rachel McKibbens. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Rachel McKibbens with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Rachel McKibbens saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking further up this page, I see one warning after another relating to copyright violation. Please understand that you may not copy content from external websites into Wikipedia, and risk being prevented from editing without further warning if you do so again. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've also blanked Clemens Starck for the same reason. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RCFrancis, concerns regarding your inappropriate use of copyrighted materials to create Wikipedia articles have been brought to your attention for years and yet continue with no response from you whatsoever. As such, I've blocked your account indefinitely in order to protect Wikipedia from further copyright concerns. You can be unblocked as soon as you post an appeal that addresses the copyright concerns and demonstrates an understanding of WP:COPYRIGHT.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RCFrancis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

COI plus apparent inability - still- to understand Wikipedia's copyright policies. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think I understand why I was blocked. I did not copy or paste anything from a copyrighted document. However the text I wrote may have been interpreted as mimicking copyrighted material. From now on I will paraphrase from any document that might be copyrighted. I would love to have another go at Rachel McKibbens' Wikipedia page and see if that stands up to editor review. I am a volunteer at Copper Canyon Press and have been involved in creating Wiki pages for a number of our poets who don't already have a Wiki page. I attempt to be informational rather than promotional about these poets. Thanks for your consideration. Bob Francis

So you are saying you have a conflict of interest? 331dot (talk) 22:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closely paraphrasing copyrighted material is not accepted either. You need to write it in your own words. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 00:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need some examples of where I paraphrased copyrighted material. For example in the Rachel McKibbens wiki page that you folks tore down, I am not sure what I did. I fully referenced all internal and external refs that I may have paraphrased. It seems a bit silly to try to get around the copyright issue by simply putting in some different (but less descriptive) words. McKibbens' wiki page is now a hollow shadow of what it was. The same can be said of the Clemens Starck wiki page that I wrote. So, in order to mend my ways I need to see a few clear examples of where I violated copyrighted material. Once I see some concrete examples, I can easily change the way I approach writing wikipedia articles. Thanks for your time. Bob Francis

Copyright problem: Benjamin Alire Sáenz

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Benjamin Alire Sáenz, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.coppercanyonpress.org/pages/browse/book.asp?bg={27C223D4-6416-4B64-B672-9FDD25BCE0C0}, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Benjamin Alire Sáenz and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Benjamin Alire Sáenz, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.

If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Benjamin Alire Sáenz. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Benjamin Alire Sáenz with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Benjamin Alire Sáenz saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TJScalzo (talk) 14:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]