User talk:R4raz

September 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:London International Festival of Early Music, from its old location at User:R4raz/sandbox/London International Festival of Early Music. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, R4raz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London International Festival of Early Music has been accepted

London International Festival of Early Music, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 19:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of LIFEM (disambiguation)

Hello, R4raz

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, LIFEM (disambiguation), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you! I do disagree with this though because the disambiguation page says 'if an ambiguous term has no primary topic, then that term needs to lead to a disambiguation page.' I would say that the Exploratory Music festival doesn't qualify as a primary topic for 'LIFEM'. The two festivals are both niche music festivals which take place over a few days in London, so they are (I would say) equivalent in significance and thus neither qualify as a primary topic in the way it's set out in the Wikipedia guidelines.

I cannot claim objectivity in this, as I said in my original notes, but I feel that if there is a primary topic it should be the Early Music festival, as it's actually still an event which happens (the next one is in November this year, whereas the Exploratory Music festival last occurred in 2012), which seems like an objective criteria for a primary topic, but I'd also accept a disambiguation page if current activity is not something which Wikipedia feels should have a bearing on the relevance of the topic (I'm trying to avoid the 'what comes to mind' trap!). Traffic to both pages is low but similar.

I've looked down the deletion criteria which you linked to and I can't see an obvious candidate for which rule I violated in creating this disambiguation page so I'd appreciate more direction there if possible so I can understand where I went wrong. R4raz (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]