User talk:ApplePieGuy95

This is my talk page. Anyone who wants to discuss anything with me, or who wants to send me any kind of message, may do so here.

Nobility versus royalty

Hello! Please read our articles Nobility and Royalty. It is a common misconception that they are the same thing. They are not. Best wishes, SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of this kind of damage needs to be repaired. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And this plus anything else you've done like that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sincerely sorry that I made these mistakes. I was, in fact, aware of the fine line between "nobility" and "royalty", but I was in confusion over how to distinguish between them.

The amount of pages in the subcategory necessitated adding more subcategories--I thought to do this by nationality, but, considering the mixture of people in this category in question, this was a very bad idea. R23$94ACQ3R (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The line is not that "fine". Royalty creates nobility. Nobility obeys royalty. Will you fix all that? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will. I indeed felt like I was doing something wrong, and discovered that I have.

The best way to go about this is just to remove the subcategories and put everything back in the large category until we can figure out how to sort it. Perhaps it would be best to start by putting "Royalty" and "Nobility" into separate categories.

Until we decide, we won't run any risky experiments like this. R23$94ACQ3R (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted MOST of the subcategories, and have put the articles back into the main category. Some work remains to be done, but I am MOSTLY finished. I will alert you when I am completely finished.

A matter of some concern: although I agree with you that my move was a reckless miscalculation, there is another user named StarTrekker who may think otherwise; I infer this from the fact that they seemed to approve of my initial edits by "thanking" me for creating one of these categories, and then proceeding to add people into it. To avoid any confusion, you should remind them of the guidelines in case they try to put anything back or reverse the changes I have made. Thanks! R23$94ACQ3R (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The line between nobility and "royalty" in the Early Roman Empire wasn't exactly what we think today, but if you think deleting the category for Roman nobility who died as children is the best choice then I'm ok with that.★Trekker (talk) 18:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to hear that. I simply ask that you don't make any changes to the Category page until we figure out how to properly divide it into subcategories. R23$94ACQ3R (talk) 18:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One category for [nationality] royalty who died as children and another for [nationality] nobility who died as children. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a great idea. I was thinking the exact same thing. I'll begin work on it as soon as possible. R23$94ACQ3R (talk) 13:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed a problem (this was the main reason why I screwed up in the first place): many of these "royals" also have "noble titles". Of course, the royal titles would supersede the noble titles, but I would like to confirm that this is true. R23$94ACQ3R (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To summarize it better, would this require putting some people into both categories, or would we put them in certain ones based on the highest title they held? R23$94ACQ3R (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Highest. A royal-born king, queen, prince or princess can never be classified as nobility. Their lower titles, if any, are not relevant in classifying them. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hi R23$94ACQ3R! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 16:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename request

Your request was malformed. If you still want a rename, the request form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest is easier to get right. Happy editing, Cabayi (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of siblings of presidents of the United States (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samoht27 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article appears redundant to the article for the First family of the United States, which discusses the family of each president of the United States.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of siblings of presidents of the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Samoht27 (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ApplePieGuy95! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Samoht27 (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]