User talk:Qxz/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Qxz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
Another One bites the Dust
You bastard my edit was very constructive!
Yea up yours dude!!! – Waffleking420 13:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
message of some sort
( This person thinks he has the right to edit the works of others when he himself swears and uses vulgarities. Do you know how vulgar that "b" word that you just used is? You claim too that your edit is constructive...hahahahahaha...why can't I claim my edits are constructive too? Dear god, with editors like you...no wonder wikipedia is what is is...for gods sake...buck up....i am also a little sissygirl who can't take it. My favourite color is pink and i like to ride horses. – 07S76 05:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I, Chrislk02, award you this anti vandalism barnstar for your hard anti-vandalism work. Your reports to WP:AIV are always impeccable with properly warned, currently active vandals. Your hard work is much aprpeciated and has not gone unnoticed! Keep up the excellent work. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC) |
- We all start a little rough around the edges! However, you have done an excellent job adapting. I love seeing your reprots at WP:AIV because I know they are good! Keep up the excellent work i could see you with the mop someday. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- a.) I have never written a featured article b.) I know nothing about image licesning. I got my start in anti-vandalism. I was just lettign you know that sometime in the future, after youve been here a little longer, I might be interested in nominating you. If you ever feel that you are ready or would like a nom, feel free to drop by my page and let me know. I would gladly review your stuff and let you know what I think! Thanks again for the hard work. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Holy !@#$%
2007/1 1563 2007/2 16116
You've only been here two months!! 16k edits in one month! Wow, you have no life. Keep up the great work, Qxz. I am considering nominating you for adminship, but I know many people would oppose someone who's only been here for such a short period of time. I'll offer in April-May, if someone else hasn't already. Keep up the great work. I appreciate the AIV reports (although Chris beats me on a lot of them). =) Nishkid64 17:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- I know I have already given you an award but in light of your edit count and the length of tiem youve been here coupled with your accuracy at WP:AIV, I have another award for you. Here it goes. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The Exceptional Newcomer Award | |
| I, Chrislk02, award you this exceptional newcomer award. In your 2 months here you have shown amazing potential with your impeccable WP:AIV reports and your massive edit count (close to 19k in a single month). You truly are an exceptional newcomer! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC) |
Daniel Brandt DRV
[1]. —Freakofnurture freak(talk) 18:11, 23 February, 2007 (UTC)
Another thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page. I appreciate the work you are doing to counter vandalism! —Remember the dot (t) 18:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Question about starting projects or finding one
As I am still eagerly chipping away at the colossal amount of articles that need assessment for WPBIOs - is there a project already out there for this? Or is it possible to start a project specifically for assessing this huge backlog of articles (138,000+ that have been tagged for the WPBiography project). On my own I calculate that does 200 assessments a day it will take me 3.5 years. Not exactly fun. With 20 people doing 200 edits a day it would take 34 days - ideally it would be 100 people working on this project, taking a little under 7 days. Is it possible to start a project solely for the purpose of getting through this backlog? --Ozgod 18:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
I Agree with Nishkid64
You have made more edits in one month than I have made in 6 !!!! Now for the substance of this message, you have enough edits in the Wikipedia namespace that you should be familiar with the policies of this wiki. What I am getting at is do you want me to nominate you for adminship in about 1 month. Please tell me how you feel about this on my talk page, it's the "trip" part of my signature :D ~Steptrip 14:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- What I meant by the # of Edits in the wikipedia namespace is that it will show people who think that you have not been here long enough that you are more familiar with policy than they are. As for the oddness of my question, I don't understand why you think my nomination is odd when other people are trying to nominate you for RfA. (I'm not fully awake yet, don't take this as sarcasm.) ~Steptrip 14:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good point, sorry for any confusion I may have caused. ~Steptrip 14:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Award of a Barnstar
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| The Barnstar of Diligence is awarded to Qxz in recognition of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. Addhoc – 18:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC) |
Cheers!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage :-) Will (aka Wimt) 17:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Likewise. That was so fast I didn't even notice until it was already over. What a bizarre episode. Urhixidur 17:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
make-money etc
I thought you might like to know I've proposed this site for spam blacklisting. Three different anon users have been at this a while. But I don't know how long it will take to block! Notinasnaid 17:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
WHEN DID I EDIT THE MATTHEW WEB PAGE????
When did I edit the Matthew Webb page at all? My name doesn't even appear in the page edit's history. I wish for you to retract and apologize for the warning you illegitimately posted on my talk page or point out SPECIFICALLY when I made any edits to the Matthew Web page.Dogface 18:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Edit to Orgy
Either delete the first paragraph of the Orgy page or move the group sex material to the Group sex page. As it stands, "Orgy" and "group sex" are far too redundant to deserve separate pages. I was being helpful by increasing the uniqueness of each page.Dogface 19:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Cheers
......for reverting my user page and talk page from IP vandalism, you do great anti vandal work, keep it up RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 13:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Visnjica sa brda.jpg listed for deletion
Thank you very much for informing me, I added some comment at talk page at Visnjica sa brda (here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:Visnjica_sa_brda.jpg) Please read my explanation and remove it from delation section...
Sorry because of my bad English --Wladimir 13:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment from Aguilar 2007
Your definition of vandalism is wack.
Just because you don't like what's being said, it doesn't make it vandalism. You don't know all the facts, and are not an authority on ANYTHING besides editing wikipedia to suit your biased agendas.
PS DELETE ME I REALLY DON'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT CONTRIBUTING TO YOUR LAME SITE THAT WAS MADE BY 3RD GRADERS. – Aguilar 2007 – 14:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
AntiVandalism
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I, Orthologist, award you this anti-vandalism barnstar for your insistency reverting the vandalism on the Aeschylus aricle.[2] I too have found myself in a situation like yours, and would like to congratulate you for your persistence. – Orthologist 17:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
A Well Earned Barnstar
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| I, Persian Poet Gal, award Qxz this barnstar for dispatching countless vandals at the AIV page and fighting to protect Wikipedia from numerous vandalizing ruffians! ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
Talk page
Thanks for that revert. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning out the vandalism! -- Richard D. LeCour (talk/contribs) 20:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Media literacy
The edit was relevant, some spammer had copied and pasted the article onto itself over and over. I removed the copies. Chamale 20:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
explanation!
i recently made a clean up (and yet there is still room for more clean up though) on the links section of the "israel" article. right after it the updates were reverted, and i got a vandalizm alert!!
a. why is this vandalizm?!?!?! b. if you take the steps to alert on vandalizm, why don`t you state and explain your opinion that this is vandalizm?! that is very ignorant behavior! amos 20:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
ALSO I ask you to retract and apologize for the warning you illegitimately posted on my talk page or point out SPECIFICALLY what kind of vandalizm i made with my updates to the "israel" article. amos 20:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
There is not even a tiny chance that it was me who put this text on the page. this is a bug in the wikipedia system without any doubt. someone edit that page with this sentence and i edited the links at the same time. wikipedia administration put both changes under my name. not even 0.001% chance it was written under my edit. amos 20:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Five Barnstars at a time - I'm in awe at your dedication!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| I award, firstly, the Original Barnstar for very hard work on Wikipedia. The Evil Clown 22:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
| This one is for spending 17+ hours reverting vandalism on Wikipedia in one day! The Evil Clown 22:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This is for all your minor edits. The Evil Clown 22:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| The Barnstar of Diligence is presented to Qxz for New Page patrol. The Evil Clown 22:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| This one is self explanatory. The Evil Clown 22:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |
- Erk! – Qxz 22:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I miscounted a bit. Today, you edited for about 15 hours, getting between 1000 and 1500 edits (maybe around 1250). The Barnstars aren't being devalued - you are devaluing every editor on Wikipedia there is. If you go at this rate for a year and half (I think that is the average time until a succesful RFA), you'd have 50000 edits. So, are you interested in be a sysop? When you reach 3 months ,maybe, you'll pass the RFA. The Evil Clown 22:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Just to let you know, there is a line of people who will be ready to nominate when the time comes, lol. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm in there! The Evil Clown 22:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Qxz! It's fully OK to not wan't to be a sysop, but when I do RC patrol, I'm beaten by you at least a tenth of the time. The only reason people haven't come to you is because of time. I honestly believe, after being beaten so constantly, you would pass right now. The Evil Clown 22:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- I know, it is relatively tough, but I believed you were a sysop until I saw your page, and newcomer barnstar. That was one of the biggest surprises I encountered on Wikipedia. – Evilclown93 22:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm one month old here, so I can't know everything can I? I like the place, and there is always work to be done! The Evil Clown 22:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Editprotected edit request at Template: talk:User5
Since you perm-protected {{User5}}, I should let you know I've requested an edit, at Template talk:User5, to add {{rfcu}} at the end for reference by Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets, where {{User5}} is extensively used. -- Ben 04:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. I didn't actually protect {{user5}}; apart from anything else I'm not an administrator. I merely noticed the talk page didn't have {{permprot}} – as seems to be standard for protected templates – so I added it. You can see here that the template was actually protected by Luna Santin (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves); contact him for an explanation, or alternatively just wait until your {{editprotected}} is noticed – Qxz 05:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
You're fast,very fast at reverting vandalism
Good on ya! Beat me like 50 times in trying to revert vandalism Af648 11:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Same thing here! You're good! RyGuy 13:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going to call ditto here. Thank you, and keep up the good work. Shimaspawn 14:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Too fast for me to keep up with. - Dan D. Ric 15:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Me too! Way impressive! Tell us, Qxz, what's your secret? --Strangerer (Talk) 16:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Oh! I see the mistake. I entirly missed that! Thanks for fixing it. :-) RyGuy 14:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
208.138.193.150
I noticed you warned this fellow a block would follow for any more vandalism. I just reverted a blank he did on self awareness... need to do something about this guy thanks Inseeisyou 14:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
WE ARE NOT HAVE ISRAELI ROCK TOP 20
I'M FROM ISRAEL WE NOT HAVE THE CVER ISRAELI ROCK TOP 20 IM VERY ANGRY AND I PLEASED FROM U TO DELETE THIS. – User:217.132.98.99 14:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Keep it up
Just fielded an OTRS complaint from a school, to find that you had already fixed the vandalism and reported the vandal. Fast work, well done. Guy (Help!) 17:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Anne Frank
I apologize for the trouble I'm causing you. I'm having problems with my VP in the sense that I can't warn users. I can revert, however, so bear with me here!--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 18:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Here's a Barnstar
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| There's not a single minute on VandalProof that I don't see you reverting vandalism and warning users; for that I give you this barnstar. Ed ¿Cómo estás? 20:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC) |
I'm thinking about tagging this {{db-redirtypo}}. Why did you create this redirect? If it was in response to the request on the Wikipedia:Requested articles/sports, the redirect doesn't seem to fulfill the request at all. *Mishatx*-In\Out 22:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Assessment from an article page
Thank you for helping out with the Biography assessment drive. Good news. Outriggr recently designed a script that will cut youf biography assessment time down by about ten fold (what took ten hours now may only take one hour with Outriggr's script). For more information, please see the 'assessment from article page' discussion. -- Jreferee 20:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
And another
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Once again I field an OTRS complaint to find that Qxz has done the needful. I see a pattern emerging here... Guy (Help!) 15:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC) |
Both attacked the same articles in similar manners withing minutes of each other. I believe User:Blarga2 struck first, logged out and attacked as an anonymous IP. Ronbo76 03:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement
Hi Qxz, you made this ad? —Meteoroid » 03:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Swiftness
I don't know how you do it, but you seem to beat me to nearly every revert against vandalism. Haha. I would give you the barnstar, but I'm not even sure where to go to get the template for it. If/when I find it, I will be sure to award it to you, though. Bsroiaadn 08:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's quite all right. I have far too many barnstars anyway. Though for future reference, see Wikipedia:Barnstars. Thanks – Qxz 08:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you say so. Haha. Thank you very much for the link. Bsroiaadn 08:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
The failure of my counter to detect your reverts as automatic were due to the edit summary saying "Revert edit(s)..." rather than "Reverted edit(s)...". Out of all the revert scripts I'd ever seen up to this point, only navigation popups started with any word other than 'Reverted', and I had a special case in for them. I've added your summary to the counter as a script/tool revert (I guess you didn't type in all those edit summaries by hand!); if you bypass your cache it should work for you, at least on IE. (What browser did it fail to recognize your edit summaries at all on?) --ais523 09:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't have a copy of Opera to test on, nor a way to install it (I'm stuck using IE because I don't have administrative rights on the computer I'm editing on), so I can't really look in to the problem. (By the way, don't try to run the 'last 1000'/'last 2000' tool on your own edits; that can screw up quite badly on vandalfighters because they edit so many different pages once each, and has been known to crash my computer before in such cases.) Hope that helps! --ais523 09:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I've converted image 5 here to the PNG format, as requested by Remember the dot on its image description page. Perhaps you could replace the fifth image with Image:Qxz-ad5.png? I can't replace it myself because you protected the page with the .css suffix. (Unfortunately, the PNG format can't do animations, so it's just one image that can be changed.) --ais523 09:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- As for why PNG is preferred over GIF, I'm not entirely sure (I think it's a combination of copyright idealism, and the availability of tools to recompress, etc.), but Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload (and less clearly Wikipedia:Image use policy) both recommend PNG over GIF. --ais523 15:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you help me?
I saw you patrolling the RC and I want to do the same. I already have Vandal Fighter 3.5 and VoA Revert tool. But the revert tool is appending the phrase "TWINKLE" to my edit summaries. How can I stop it from adding that? Or, if you have better tools, please recommend them to me. Thanks. - Microtony 09:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Damnit
You screwed up the archiving on WT:A, hiding two pages and half a month of comments. In the future, make sure that you don't lose links when you change between schemes. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Wh, no biggie, I got pissed because my comment vanished and I thought someone had gone maliciously deleting something. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you tagged this as "should be PNG", and indeed someone's gone and made a PNG of it. There is in fact a reason why I've uploaded it as a GIF – as you can probably guess from the name, it's part of a series (6 in total), some of which are animated and some of which aren't. I've designed a template to display one of them at random on my talk page – and writing such a template is a lot easier if the images are all identically named except for the number. So since some of them had to be GIFs, I used GIF for all of them. If you would prefer that I used PNG for all non-animated images, I can rewrite the template, though file size and image quality don't seem to be a concern. Thanks – Qxz 14:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, I would much prefer that you set a good example by using the PNG and SVG formats instead of the GIF format. But seeing as it's for your personal talk page, it's not something I'm going to get too upset about. —Remember the dot (t) 17:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
What has happened with the Image:Qxz-ad5.gif (5th image) of the ad? How come I no longer see it?Never mind. —Meteoroid » 03:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
You're right. Wow. I am an idiot. I was confused. Thanks for clearing things up. Randomfrenchie 00:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
What happened?
Got a message about a vandalization I didn't even do. Is this an error? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:216.86.70.175&redirect=no – 216.86.70.175 05:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Yet another suggestion of RfA nomination
Since you have recieved over 25,000 edits in only 2 months, it is possible that i will nominate you for RfA in the next few months (sometimes, I will nominate users simutaniously). —Meteoroid » 03:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Twinkle summaries
Good point, I assumed (wrongly) that the first was just... a mistake. TW lets you flag as AGF, Vandal, or just generic. I'll start using the generic, it's smarter--you're right... Sorry. - Denny 07:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, I'm going to use the generic RV tag for all the borderline ones like that. And for RC, its... oddly relaxing. - Denny 07:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Lwów-Warsaw School of Logic
Hi. I have made redirect "Lwów-Warsaw School of Logic" to "Lviv-Warsaw School...", because of unification of English names of both cities. So, now both versions are exist and it should be change, because they are equal. The only difference is name of Lviv. I think only one of them can exist. Gerea-en 09:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Now it seems to be OK. Gerea-en 21:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
your software
...so...... is the software that u r using ready to be released yet? —Meteoroid » 13:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
oh and one other thing, is the software cross-platform compatible? (i.e. Windows, Linux, Mac, etc.) —Meteoroid » 03:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Revert advice
Thanks... so for blankings (whole), checking back few is key. are there any other gotchas I should I know about or tricks that can help? - Denny 07:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Ads.
I love 'em! Real96 01:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- You know what? You should make a banner on sockpuppets, WP:AIV, WP:BLP, vandals and assuming good faith. :-) THAT WOULD BE SO FUNNY! Real96 01:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Cross-platform compatiblity
oh and one other thing, is the software cross-platform compatible? (i.e. Windows, Linux, Mac, etc.) —Meteoroid » 03:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)