User talk:Quogud

November 2006

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wizard-Subject. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac 15:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

Your edits to Coca-Cola slogans

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Coca-Cola slogans. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue spamming you will be blocked from editing. AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 20:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Cola wars

Before adding a possibly inappropiate external link to an article,like you did at Cola wars, please discuss the changes on the articles talk page first, as this is normally considered spam. You are welcome to continue contributing, but please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, and failure to abide by these policies could unfortunately get you blocked or even banned. Thank you. AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to List of Coca-Cola brands

Adding unrelated external links to articles is considered vandalism. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 03:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Coca-Cola and The Coca-Cola Company

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Coca-Cola, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 07:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Two faces of coke

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Two faces of coke, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.killercoke.org/crimes-suntrust.htm. As a copyright violation, Two faces of coke appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Two faces of coke has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Two faces of coke. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Two faces of coke, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --NMChico24 02:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for vandalism of Wikipedia

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Vietnam trade office in the United States

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Vietnam trade office in the United States, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vietnamembassy-usa.org/learn_about_vietnam/vietnam_us_trade/. As a copyright violation, Vietnam trade office in the United States appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Vietnam trade office in the United States has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Vietnam trade office in the United States. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Vietnam trade office in the United States, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Pepsi

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Pepsi. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 14:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]