User talk:Quiubennt

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I wasn't editing any other wiki I was just playing around in sandbox Quiubennt (talk) 00:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to think that's okay. It isn't. --Yamla (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quiubennt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't mean to do any harm I just was making a Mock wiki for a game I was playing, and I didn't know that what I was doing was against the rules, also the only reason I was editing other people pages were that I not good with Wikipedia and I was compromising by copying other code and I'm sorry, and I won't do it againQuiubennt (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Your block will not expire. Please read and follow the instructions Yamla wrote above to earn your trust into the Wikipedia community. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Quiubennt was: "so should I start working on helping on pages that need clean up when my block expires". Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

did I do the steps rightQuiubennt (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

You'll have to use {{unblock}} as written above. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And remember to attribute properly, using :

Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

== Danny Harf ==) Danny Harf's Defy section grandma fix

Directed and filmed by: Sean Kilgus, Saturday, December 18, 2011, was the premier of Defy in Orlando at the Beacham Theater. The film was sponsored by Transworld Wakeboarding, Fox, Nautique boats, Tige boats, and System 2.0. [3] Erik Ruck rides with Danny and meets him at a wakeboard tournament in 1999, where they become friends. Shawn Watson, Brian Grubb, Parks Bonifay, Shane Bonifay, Chad Sharpe, Nick Weinacker, and Francois Roy came together to make "Pointless Productions," a group they had formed to make a video called "Incomplete" to display that they were the best wakeboarders of the time. Danny was the first, and only rider to do a 1260 degree spin behind boat, in 2008. Danny rides a Ronix wakeboard throughout the whole movie. The crew that Danny rides within Defy consists of Jimmy Lariche, Bob Soven, Parks Bonifay, Adam Errington, Rusty Malinosky, and Shaun Murray 20 miles outside of Seattle is Danny's favorite riding spot and also serves for his team's training area at Radar Lake. They set up a 100 ft pool beside Radar during the movie and used a ramp to transfer to and from the lake. After Radar Lake's session is done, they head down to Mexico to wakeboard. The next stop of filming, the crew headed down to Australia and tried wake boarding on the waves of Australia by using a jet ski to tow the riders into the wave. After their trip to Australia, they head back to Radar Lake to wakeboard there again. They also decide to add wake skating to the equation about 45 minutes into the video and do a segment of people riding and doing tricks on wakeskates.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Pinging blocking admin: @Yamla Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are unable to follow the instructions given, en.wikipedia isn't the place for you. I suggest finding another wiki to edit for at least six months. --Yamla (talk) 22:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 10:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I did not know that I was not permitted to erase my talk page Quiubennt (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I was wondering if I could have another admin way on this, since I actually want to be a part of Wikipedia again, but Yamla seems to have a bias against me and has not helped, and was rude and disrespectful towards me when I asked for clarification on a questionQuiubennt (talk) 21:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

When you complete the steps in the previous unblock decline above, the unblock template will flag an admin. Usually, the original admin (Yamla in this case) will not review subsequent unblock requests after declining one. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 22:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the issue I was having with Yamla when I asked him for clarification on his steps he told me flatly that if I couldn't follow a simple step I should leave, even though I was struggling to understand and was asking for clarification Quiubennt (talk) 22:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Since i have no chance of getting unblocked since Yamla who seems to treat me like I'm a horrible criminal and avoided helping when i asked for clarification on something I don't understand, can I get rid of this since it's pointlessQuiubennt (talk) 02:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

Can I make a suggestion? I can see your attempt at following the instructions for a second chance and you failed on several fronts. Trying again, with a better understanding of what is required, may result in an unblock.

You identified a page where you thought you could demonstrate your mastery of Wikipedia rules by making an improvement: Danny Harf. I can't say this is a great choice, since the article is already woefully undersourced and is tagged as needing grammar cleanup, but you could have improved that situation by adding good sources.

You semi-successfully made a partial copy of that page according to the instructions but you failed to make the required attribution in the edit summary as instructed and you didn't carry over the included reference as an actual reference.

That first save should represent the 'before' stage of the text, before you have made any improvements. I don't see that you followed up by making any improvements at all.

What the unblocking admin would be looking for is a competent improvement on that 'before' state. Adding a piece of content supported by a proper citation would be a good thing to aim for.

I think this situation is why Y is losing patience. The instructions are quite clear and step-by-step. You more-or-less got the first of them sorta right. Why not continue? Or start over trying to more exactly follow the instructions (and perhaps choose a better starting point)? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Quiubennt (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]