User talk:Quinton Feldberg/Archive 1

Archive 1

Joe Philbin - Nickname Edits Removed

Please can you explain why you will not allow the nicknames of Rugby League Player Joe Philbin to be added? A large amount of Rugby League players have nicknames included on their Wikipedia page, and I provided two references to support the use of these nicknames. One being his player profile on the official club website, the other being his own personal (verified) twitter account where he uses this nickname. We are attempting to make these changes as a friend of the person and do so in good faith and are (we believe to be) complying by wikipedia guidelines and referencing correctly. Please can you advise why these changes are being removed and perhaps help us to display them in a format supported and accepted by wikipedia? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliveyyy (talk • contribs) 15:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

FYI

Firstly, thanks for leaving a message on User talk:61.214.53.95 to communicate with User:61.214.53.95. In the future, when confronting blatantly disruptive editors, it is often best to report the user at WP:AIV (after they have been given 3-4 warnings and appear to be unquestionably vandalists) as User:prmcd16 did here. Please feel free to reach me on my talk page or ping me if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. --JustBerry (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your persistent efforts here. Keep up the great work, and welcome to Wikipedia! JustBerry (talk) 05:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Quinton Feldberg. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 10:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Question

Hello, Quinton Feldberg. Thanks for your antivandalism work, it's appreciated. Are you new here or have you had previous accounts? Widr (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

I have edited under IP addresses for several years, and finally decided to create an account. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Updating South Island Distance Education School (SIDES) to current information

I am still trying to update and remove old content.

Why you keep reverting the changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.White (talk • contribs) 00:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

I explained in the edit summary. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Chris Philp

I understand you edited my added information concerning Chris Philp.

Here are my reasons for including this information.

1. He is described as a 'serial entrepreneur' I believe details about his failed businesses ie. Clearstone, should be as relevant as all the successes already mentioned.

2. He is on the Treasury Select Committee, has spoken about corporate responsibility, David Cameron and the Panama scandal, MPs publishing their tax returns yet has businesses registered offshore in Jersey..

I agree maybe information concerning his brother Clive's business interest and his wife's business interests maybe not as relevant.

Previous users appear to be editing out information which may appear negative and keeping in the positive, and it concerns me that they are working for/ friends of Chris Philp or Conservative Party and therefore have a conflict of interest.

Please advise.

Many thanks.

Jojogungun (talk) 10:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

There seem to be a lot of assholes around tonight. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 06:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome! Either that or its all just one MEGA asshole! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 06:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

• That's possibly a philosophical question I'm not equipped to answer tonight. Take care, Drmies (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

I don't mean to spoil your beer, but can I ask you something? How do you always seem to know where the "derp vandal" currently is? And yet for some reason, he usually will leave you alone. Sro23 (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Redolta is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Redolta📱 ^Contribs 00:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Quinton Feldberg (talk) 06:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

House of Cards revert

Why you have reverted my edit? The release is on 30th May, not March, please lookup the source before you revert thinks… --178.202.133.101 (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

FORMATS

Why are you changing all the formats? Has a consensus been reached somewhere that everything is to be MM/DD/YYYY? Yours, Quis separabit? 21:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

I was reverting block-evasion by Kipperfield (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Oh. OK. Thanks. Quis separabit? 00:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

And I see you've moved on to mass rollback of all the named sock account's edits. Please, I encourage you to take pause before continuing, because as was pointed out recently in the SPI, not all of this person's edits are completely unreasonable, sock or not. Wikipedia:Dealing with sock puppets#Deleting articles or article edits explains it nicely. Otherwise, when in doubt, just use common sense. Sro23 (talk) 02:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

"If they have the most recent edit and it isn't adding anything to the article" That seems to describe all of his edits. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

But most of the time, it is adding something to the article. I'm not going to review every edit you just reverted, but taking just a quick glance, I see that this edit was a good one and so was this one. Date warrior socks or not, these editors are making sure articles fall in line with MOS, and more often than not their changes are helpful. When socks fix obvious typos, we let their edits stick, so why is this situation really any different? Technically I guess you were allowed to do that, but to me it's just reverting for the sake of reverting and only adds to the disruption. Sro23 (talk) 11:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Jerzy

I made some changes to the article and you reverted them back. His first name is Jerzy not Jury. He is a member of the Marians of the Immaculate Conception, not the Marianists, a different community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.224.161 (talk) 16:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

WIKILINKING IS NOT VANDALISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:32.218.33.4. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. 32.218.33.4 (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, that revert was a misclick. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 15:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Yisroel,Spira

Why did you delete my edits to yisroel spira? Samtisser (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

What edits? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

about the recent edit of sri lanka national football team

Those fixtures were in 2015.That's the reason to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogsmead (talk • contribs) 06:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Doug McKenzie edits

Your edit removed all of the updated television crediting as sourced from IMDB — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.121.227 (talk) 06:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

From Samsnow

RE: your reversion of my edit to the Mayday Rescue page: I reverted it back. Reason: Mayday Rescue is a completely separate organisation from the White Helmets/Syria Civil Defence, and therefore the entry SHOULD NOT redirect to the White Helmets page. It should either have its own page or be removed entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsnow (talk • contribs) 07:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Banff Academy

I have reverted several vandalism edits to Banff Academy today that were added by a vandalism-only account, including one which added "alan west is my best friend and has a special skill". You have reinstated this material and added a template to my talk page suggesting this is vandalism. And no explanation? Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

That revert was a misclick. I have redone your revert and removed the warning from your page. Sorry. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Misclicks happen, but perhaps next time you would consider leaving some form of explanation in the edit summary to indicate that an error had occurred. Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Quinton Feldberg, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 00:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

hello, it seems you undid my little edit.

just a word of advice. my IP is not static, you have no cookies on my system, and I am able to easily mask my IP in seconds. I also have alot of time on my hands so be a sport and leave it up for a day? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.62.37 (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

as I said before

I'm not stopping, and your block is meaningless and will do nothing but buy you a few seconds before I do another edit. leave it for a day and let me have some fun with this and then you can change it back all you want — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.62.37 (talk) 23:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Why you haras me ?

Why you haras me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasalghoula (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Arg - Bra football rivalry

Could you please bother checking the sources before accusing me of vandalism and threaten with blocks, please? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.177.82.236 (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Jaime Cortez Edit

Hi Quinton,

Thank you for your input on the Jaime Cortez but I disagree that the information I provided was not constructive. I will be adding it back. I am working on this page for a class project and need to provide information on the context of the graphic novel, as well as its impact for it is one of the artist's most prominent work. I included my references in the original post.

Rosamorales.sf (talk) 03:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Rosa

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Wow! That was quick! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Air Europa destinations

Why did you revert my edit? I readded the entry with a source because the previous edit was not sourced. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Those edits are not constructive. I don't know why you keep deleting the entry. It has a reliable source. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry about that. You didn't indicate in the summary that you had added a source. I won't revert it anymore. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Actually, in the first edit summary I stated "ref (short for reference) added". Should of said "source added" instead. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I missed it. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent reversions

You reverted my edits again at Lihue Airport and at Los Angeles Airport. I was adding a source to an unsourced edition. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, again! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Quinton Feldberg! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Vanamonde (talk) 07:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

De la part de Mileva

Va te faire shampouiner abruti !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:2EE2:9910:B47A:FAAD:5FB2:32A8 (talk) 17:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Content on Angry Black woman page

Hi Quinton,

I received your message. My intention of editing this page is to provide additional historical and present context concerning the Angry Black woman myth. I have no issues with your change. Please let me know if you have any concerns.

Best, Ash

Clicked the wrong button. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

David Francis edit

I will said this only once do not make any changes again to David Francis Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrielvr22 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David Francis

Hello Quinton,

Can you explain why you reverted back so far erasing so much work? I see that you did some edits of other things on this page, which were helpful, but you took a big chunk of work out. This page is still in draft form and am getting the stuff up, then going back to edit the context and duplication of sections. If you would please explain more than it did not feel constructive, so I know what to fix that would be wonderful.

Thank you, Jeremy typo (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)jeremy_typo

I have restored it! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Quinton! was this just a test? or was I doing something wrong? Jeremy typo (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)jeremy_typo

I clicked the wrong button. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

ah ok, thank you, you had me worried lol Jeremy typo (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)jeremy_typo

"Robbery laws in the United States" and Rollback

Hi there. I noticed your reverts on Robbery laws in the United States (currently a redirect) and wanted to let you know that this is a situation where rollback should not be used as its usage is contrary to our guidelines for utilizing the tool, to quote "[it is] considered inappropriate to use [rollback] in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected." In this case, a user unilaterally decided to redirect a new article without discussion and the article creator (who is a brand new editor) undid and continued to try and improve the article. As this is a content dispute and not simple vandalism, rollback is not the proper tool to utilize as advanced permissions should never be used for reverts other than pure vandalism, clearly disruptive conduct, own mistakes, etc. I know that when using Huggle it can be difficult to see the nuance but it is important you keep this in mind when doing anti-vandal work (especially when using semi-automated tools, for example Huggle reported the user to AIV for action after your reverts) as we want to be welcoming to new users and not scare them off. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Mifter (talk) 19:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Understood. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 20:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Full Service Network

Yes, you keep removing some of the additional services that were on the FSN, especially the sports items. These were ground breaking at the time, worthy of Sports Illustrated articles, and a precursor to today's tv applications. Please add the two sentences back in to the area under Pizza. If you want to keep the Full Service Network piece from Pittsburgh, that was added in at a much later date by the company in Pittsburgh, feel free, but they had nothing to do with the Time Warner FSN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:282:102:7DAA:2536:40B8:5F24:7446 (talk) 20:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Contributions restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Vandal

I am not vandalizing. All the chinese symbols for numers redirect to the corresponding pages. I was just doing so with these symbols as well. Goveganplease (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

When reverting ClueBot NG, it's usually a good idea to explain why in the summary. I have restored your edit. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Sorry for any troubles. I am still learning :) Goveganplease (talk) 23:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

So is ClueBot NG. :D Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Jeffrey Garcia

I am trying to include unknown facts about Jeffrey Garcia to his Wikipedia page to help spread this knowledge. However, it is constantly being removed and has been claimed as vandalism. I am very offended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paco4nicholas (talk • contribs) 23:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Looks like ClueBot NG made another mistake. Edit restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Bryan Fuller

I have recently been restoring what I firmly believe to be wrongful deletions to the article; such as: the seemingly blatant removal of all mentioning of Star Trek: Discovery based solely on the fact that he had to leave due to other commitments. He is still forever credited as co-creator, exec producer, and writer; no reason for removal; period. Also, my deletions of multiple article links in the awards and nominations section seems to be an issue; although I can't see why that is a problem; common sense would indicate that we don't need multiple links to same article in one section, no? I truly apologize if I have enraged you for any reason, but I can't understand why this is such a problem. I have reached out to you using my actual account, so before you revert again, please message me to discuss this. If nothing else: keep ST: D in; please. - Cartoon Boy (talk) 04:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

You could at least look at the changes

Although I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you mean well, with the speed of your reversion, it is apparent that you didn't even look at the changes I made to the Miranda article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:401:503:62B0:7006:C9EF:53AF:6BF0 (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Quinton Feldberg bot editing to bully people. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Mistake

I think you made a mistake. I simply asked a question about the ability of ISIS to distinguish the Yazidi people from their own people. 50.4.236.254 (talk) 03:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Which edit? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

 Restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:38, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

This is one of the reasons why wiki is pointless to edit and will never be considered a professional source

Users like you are the reason why nobody really cares about wikipedia anymore except people who obviously have no time on their hands but to harass and protest other users. What a shame. However, I didn't come here to discuss that. I came here to discuss your reversion of my edit.

My removal of currently outdated and self defeating information on the Hitman: Absolution article was completely valid and by all means allowed, and I will be removing it again.

Here is why: This quote --> "...Reilly Brennan, and studio head of IO Interactive, Hannes Seifert have confirmed that Hitman: Absolution will be coming to Xbox One via backwards compatibility. It is plan on making the game compatible but it's currently unclear when the game will be made compatible." "

is simply no longer CURRENT! The 360 version of the game IS WORKING on Xbox One as of TODAY. I own the game for gosh's sake!

I didn't even add any text, as the other half of the "Backwards Compatibility" section is VALID! Quote: "...On 14 February 2017, Hitman: Absolution was made available via Backwards Compatibility on Xbox One." is a correct statement! It even has a link for citation!

I did not remove that part of the article in malice. I did it because it is simply out of date information. It blatantly states this itself!

Consider what I have explained Mr. Quinton Feldber, if that is your real name... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.39.229 (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Vandelism on WWII in Yugoslavia page

IP 178.222.116.11 continues to make tge same edits despite previous warning and now despite your warning. Person has gone through multiple IP adresses. A determined individual. What can be done to curb this behavior? 108.54.93.183 (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Requesting page protection. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Other IPs the person used were 178.233.44.231 and 93.86.83.158 for they appear one after the other due to blocks and edit the same pages using only mobile editor. Guy/Gal has touch free time for their own good. Sad such people exist here on Wikipedia. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 23:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

No contributions by 178.233.44.23. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

You forgot the 1 after the 3. Sorry extra 2. It's 178.223.44.231 Check this one.108.54.93.183 (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Contributions by 93.86.83.158 are similar to those of 178.222.116.11. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Let's wait and see if he returns. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Likely won't, he is using a new IP now. Will see if he curbs his behavior. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 00:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

If the level of disruption increases, I'll request PC protection. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

He's back at it again and on the List of wars involving Serbia in the Middle Ages Page too. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 20:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

User IPV6 - Please Help Me. Someone is making changes without my knowledge. Unsure how they have access to my IP

It is possible for multiple different people to be assigned the same IP. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Userboxes

I'm snatching two of them to my page after seeing them on yours, lol. Gatemansgc (talk) 04:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Cool Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

And I'll be borrowing a few of yours! :) Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Win! Also, if you want the little topicons (the things I have on the top right of my pages), check my userpage code under the other section, that's where I store them. Gatemansgc (talk) 04:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

You're really having fun, aren't you? Gatemansgc (talk) 04:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

of/for

I think 'for' sounds better, don't you?Zigzig20s (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

النظام الاجتماعي

Hi, you recently tagged the page النظام الاجتماعي for deletion with the A2 tag, but didn't specify which page it was a duplicate of. So could you add in which page in a foreign WP it is a duplicate of? Thanks  Seagull123  Φ  21:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Actually, it is almost an exact copy of social system just translated to Arabic. Maybe he meant to create this in the Arabic wiki since they don't have a social system article over there. Adamtt9 (talk) 21:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Copying over. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Actually, they already have an article. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:38, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Undid edits

Any particular reason why you undid my edits? Should you and user:Cyberpower678 be reported for vandalism? 37.157.106.116 (talk) 17:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Edits like this one are not constructive. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

hispid hare changes

I have recently made some changes to the hispid hare page that is true and can be proven by the Natural History Museum in London. please could you add the information back, and if you do not believe me, you can contact the Natural History Museum to prove that the information is correct, and then add it.

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freddien03 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

I reverted you because you inserted comments into the article, not because of your correction. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

well can I put the correction into the article if it is the comment you removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freddien03 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead! Please do! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Nope! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please check these edits : this new user changed unit of measurement from mm to km, and g to kg for body size, thus making the hispid hare a monster. And now s/he even claims you permitted him to do so on my talk page! -- BhagyaMani (talk) 23:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

NBA Playgrounds

I am fixing the vandalization done to the Wikipedia page by some individuals that insist on censoring vital information. The game requires a constant internet connection even for offline and local play. Victims would buy this game and lose $20 as this information is actively being hidden and now these vandals are aiding the developer in censorship. Please help make Wikipedia a proper place for important information and stop helping vandals & censors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.26.72.4 (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

RE: Richard Cheese

Sorry, I was making a swipe at the fact I added a link to what Richard Cheese's name was a pun off of, which was possibly overly anal. 2602:30A:2E7F:2170:9509:E23F:8C98:E497 (talk) 17:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Something serious

This is Gibberish eaters. I noticed you had given me a warning about vandalism for The Lorax. I just want to say, why is this wrong. I mean, I can't be blocked for putting true information, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibberish eaters (talk • contribs) 18:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ahem?

How was that vandalism that I did on the Jeopardy page? And you still didn't answer my question about The Lorax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibberish eaters (talk • contribs) 18:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Regarding reversion of Emotion

Good day, Feldberg. I came to my attension that my previous contribution regarding Wikipedia:Peer review/Emotion (Carly Rae Jepsen album)/archive1 has been reversed because "it did not appear constructive". May you kindly explain why the edit was not constructive please. User DIPLOMAT'S SON wanted his editing of Emotion to be reviewed, stating that he needed help with neutrality. I gave my advice regarding why the article is class B and not class GA and what changes need to be made, eg phrasing and word choices. Been new to Wikipedia, I am confused as to why my advice was unconstructive. May you kindly explain your reversion please? Thank you very much -张雨涵 (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

A pie

Why am I giving out a pie? --- Just 张雨涵 (talk) 18:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

AIV reports

Hi Quinton Feldberg,

You appear to have made a large number of AIV reports recently via Huggle that either aren't vandalism or are being reported after a Level 4IM warning when its not appropriate to do so. Can you double check to ensure that when using Huggle level appropriate warnings are issued before reporting someone to AIV so as to keep the backlog of reports to a minimum. If you need guidance on advice on the specifics of using Huggle there are plenty of operators of it who would be willing to help.

Amortias (T)(C) 20:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, you don't appear to have read the above notification so please:

* Desist from issuing 4IM warnings for low level vandalism

• Respond to peoples queries about why you have reverted their edits when they ask for more information otherwise its likely to just continue
• Stop reporting IP's to AIV after a single bad edit.

If not its likely someone will pull the rollback right and prevent you from being able to use Huggle at all.

Amortias (T)(C) 21:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

This editor was never given a 4im warning and I do not recall issuing any 4im warnings today, nor can I find any in my contributions history. Can you provide diffs for any 4im warnings I may have issued? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, have re-reviewed and the 4IM warnings look like they were issued by others prior to you reporting them to AIV, there are declined AIV reports because of this and several unanswered questions above (and below) that need responding to. Anti-vandalism work is not just about reverting vandalism (though most of it is) but explaining to those who you reverted why it was done when asked to explain it as the templates are about as useful as a chocolate teapot when advising people exactly what's wrong. If someone's questioning why you reverted them in a calm and appropriate manner its less likely its vandalism and more likely that its lack of knowledge of the editing policies and more can be gained from discussing this with the users in question. The fact taht youve started replying does allay some of the concern I had earlier but it would be beneficial to respond to the other queries on your talk page about reverts you've actioned. Amortias (T)(C) 21:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

GTA gang

Please, read the news from Russia first: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/world/europe/russia-moscow-gta-gang-dead.html before accusing me wrongly in vandalism of GTA gang article! If you will not stop, your action will be reported to the admins! KOT-TOK (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

 Edit restored! Warnings removed. Thank you for contacting me! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Mandela effect

I don't think my edits were that helpful to the larger article on collective false memory, but they were helpful to the smaller topic that redirects there on the Mandela Effect. If you are going to redirect it there, then that section, which is currently only 2 paragraphs, should include an explanation of why many people believe the origin of the effect is George W. Bush. Bush made many inaccurate statements over the years, but here we have a collective false memory of Bush having a false memory that people falsely remember having given rise to a popular name for collective false memories. That seems pretty helpful at least to the collective false memory portion of the larger article. If you want to take out the part about Bush Sr. and the funeral, well, that I have no problem with. Those are just interesting tidbits that are not really important to the point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18F:902:8D90:94E4:43E3:5391:60C5 (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

 Restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

we need to build a wall

               _ _ 
              | | |
__      ____ _| | |
\ \ /\ / / _` | | |
 \ V  V / (_| | | |
  \_/\_/ \__,_|_|_|

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.178.100.135 (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

From Hieucd97

No worries, mistakes happen to everyone. Have a good one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hieucd97 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

From Wikieditor3567

Hello Quinton,

I am a representative from Lorraine Schwartz who just updated the necessary information with SOURCING. I do not understand why the current information that I have provided reasoning for it being out of dater and inaccurate is constantly being change back even after I have updated it to the proper information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor3567 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm done

Alright Quinton, this is it. You haven't been responding. I don't see why my edits and only MY edits are vandalism. I think it's because you hate me. And only ME. So please give me a reason that was vandalism (please check your talk page) or else I will have you BLOCKED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibberish eaters (talk • contribs) 20:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

I don't hate you. Can you explain why this edit isn't vandalism? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Quinton, I did admit on my talk page that the Alvin edit and the Harvey Beaks edit were vandalism. I was asking about the Lorax and Jeopardy. --Gibberish eaters (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

 Restored Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

From ThatOhioGuy

Hey, Quinton Feldberg thanks for welcoming me to the wiki community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

How did you even find me on wiki anyway? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hey I just created a wiki go to the American Arena League wiki the click on the Rochester Kings I think it worked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 19:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Cool Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hey Just another question what type of wikis do you edit. and I also wanted to know if you wanted to help me create a wiki.

Wiki:the Central Penn Chargers or Savannah Coastal Outlaws — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 18:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Sure! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!

Thanks for the welcome you left on my talk page. I signed-up in 2005 and so it has been ~13 years before my first welcome message! :) Davidljung (talk) 01:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Wow! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

new

thanks for the welcome108.75.79.57 (talk) 07:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Hi QF... thank you for the welcome message.... Cheers! Manuone (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Gabby

It's not even worth it to warn her on whatever account/IP she's using. She knows full well what's going on and and this point we should just WP:DENY her attention. Thanks for your help reverting. Home Lander (talk) 22:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

AIV reports and inappropriate use of rollback

Hi Quinton. You recently reported 188.29.164.172 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) at AIV for vandalism. When I looked at the anonymous user's edits from today, it was absolutely clear to me that they were not vandalism. This is another instance in a recent pattern of you reverting good faith edits and reporting editors to AIV that are not vandalizing (see Special:Permalink/793603954). In addition, you used Huggle and rollback to revert these good faith edits without an edit summary and have done this several times recently.

I ask that first, you pay more attention when on vandalism patrol. Reverting good faith edits, warning users who did not vandalize, and reporting users to AIV who are not vandals drives people away from Wikipedia and wastes time of administrators. Second, you must not use Huggle and rollback to revert good faith edits. If you continue to misuse rollback, your rollback right will be revoked. I will note that on other occasions you have been doing a good job at fighting vandalism—the main issue is you need to be more conscientious when editing. Thank you, Malinaccier (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

This IP was blocked 2 weeks by @Widr: for block evasion. The edit you restored was valid, though. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks—chatting with Widr. Malinaccier (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Any other erroneous AIV reports today? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Looks like Materialscientist declined your report of User:Hollywoodream, but otherwise looks good. Malinaccier (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Malinaccier, I agree with you so much. Quinton Feldberg is, to me, the rudest wikipedia user on here. Quinton Feldberg always says I'm vandalising pages, and when I ask why, Quinton doesn't even respond. I even threatened Quinton I would get an administrator, a role model like you, Malinaccier, to block Quinton, but Quinton still doesn't respond. --Gibberish eaters (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Not true. I responded. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

There won't be a block here (not by a long shot), but a little more care will go a long way :). Malinaccier (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but, Quinton, you still did not answer about how I vandalised the pages on The Lorax and Jeopardy. Why, you think you rule the world! No you don't. How did I vandalise the pages? I did admit on Alvin and the Chipmunks and Harvey Beaks. --Gibberish eaters (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Gender?

By the way, Quinton, are you a boy or a girl? I don't want to offend you, but I'm kinda getting tired of calling you Quinton instead of he or she. But I don't want to assume genders. Also, what's your race and skin color? No offense! --Gibberish eaters (talk) 13:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Changing wiki page name

Hi Quinton Feldberg! Thanks for your message.

In creating the living personalities page for "Ko Sesha", a tamil language writer from India, I missed to add the "_" in the link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KoSesha), hence the page title is displayed as "KoSesha" as against "Ko Sesha". I created an alternate wiki page, this time with the correct page name (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ko_Sesha).

How do I now delete the originally create page?

Need your advice, thanks! Meghasridhar (talk) 08:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome message

I've been editing from time to time for a long time, and registered back in 2012 - but I appreciate the first welcome message a lot! Take care, Dominik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberdom-pl (talk • contribs) 11:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

And the exact opposite for me lol. I do not need a welcome message every time my ip changes. While i do not want to complain but... well maybe i do want to complain a little haha, i apreciate the notion, it is just a bit pointless. Can't ever please everyone obviously, so... whatever. Like the "endured days" userbox by the way. Let us hope that number does not grow too high lol. Carry on anway, but thought it humerous, feeling a little annoyed by the welcome to see someone apreciate it. So, cheers for the two slight chuckles. Have a good day anyway. 91.49.70.65 (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Good to be here! Looking forward to becoming an admin and eventually bureaucrat someday. Think I might start making some bots after I get rollback privileges. --PotentialPotential (talk) 13:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation.

85.193.218.178 (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Dio il Pedofilo

Hello, I'm afraid I have seen Dio il Pedofilo--5.77.69.252 (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abriannawayne (talk • contribs) 15:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks for your warm welcome message! Have a good one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:5800:2100:E809:4640:90E:EE22 (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

From ThatOhioGuy

Hello again

I was just wondering if you would like to help me create a wiki which would be the Elite Indoor Football.

Oh Yeah can you create maps.

From Your Not So Known Friend ThatOhioGuy — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOhioGuy (talk • contribs) 18:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Sure! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

How to request Adminship

I can't find the place to request adminship. Where is it? I read every wikipedia admin article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manualy20 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

You're too new to be an admin! Wait a few years and maybe 25,000 edits before applying. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks ...

... for the welcome! CrawdaddyStinker (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

User:PakePakwan's sock User:WikiPolices

User:PakePakwan is back with another sock User:WikiPolices. He is making the same edits in Zarda (food). He needs to be blocked. (2600:1001:B025:3D25:1599:A07E:22D4:25E7 (talk) 23:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC))

If you believe this to be the case, please open an investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PakePakwan. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

The issue is, I don't know how to do it. (2600:1001:B025:3D25:1599:A07E:22D4:25E7 (talk) 23:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC))

Link the diffs here, and I'll open a case for you. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

1. His response here. His previous sock did this. And WikiPolices is a new user, yet claims to have opened an "investigation" which his current history does not state.
2. His change here. He is very much against calling Mughal Empire - Mughal India. Made this very specific change. (2600:1001:B025:3D25:1599:A07E:22D4:25E7 (talk) 23:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC))

Thank you! I knew something was going on, I just didn't know who the master was! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

The admins appear to have trouble reading the diffs for some reason. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Why are you tagging me here? Better get off and stop harassing me. Stop blaming me as a sock puppet just to support your POV edits. Please behave.WikiPolices (talk) 02:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. No, he can obviously go away. Mass welcomes - just sayin'. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 07:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Warned user. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

It's a bit late after a block and semi-protection of the page. But I'll put it another way: thanking blatant vandals for their contributions is not considered a good thing. Please discriminate a bit more. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I can't read the diff you linked. Can you check and make sure you sent the right link? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it was revdeleted and is now admin-only, as it was grossly offensive vandalism referencing among other things 9/11 and a banned user and their global blocks. The fact you can't see it is indicative of how inappropriate it was to thank the user for it. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. The user was blocked without even a level 1 warning. Normally, reporting happens after level 4. What was different this time? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Also, I did not use the thank feature. Only welcome. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I suggest you read what you wrote on that talk page and the start of this section. The IP was blocked a) as an open proxy b) as a banned user and c) as a grossly offensive vandal - none of which, individually, requires a warning before a block. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

 You win! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

But can you explain to me, what part of "{{subst:welcome-anon}} ~~~~" says thank you for vandalizing Wikipedia? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

It's quite simple - after the aforementioned grossly offensive vandalism, and only vandalism, you said "Welcome - Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay". This was clearly not an appropriate response to this vandalism. BTW you seem to have left me a message on some stranger's talk page, which is only going to cause confusion. That aside, I'm just informing you about how inappropriate mass welcomes can be. All I'm saying is, please be more discriminatory. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm Jesse DiGregorio from Long Island-

Respect the Family,,,

Look Me Up on Facebook- if You Need to Talk-

Change the History Back,,,

Respect for My Family is Very Important to Me- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.219.192.137 (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Add Jesse Digregorio comment back on the Wiki

Add His Comments-

Family Tree Respect is Important- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.219.192.137 (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Ask the editor who reverted it, not me. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Put Back Jesse Digregorio Respect Comments

Stop Screwing Up the Page,,,

Big Jesse is Family- and His Comments should Be Included- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.219.192.137 (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Jesse is not Gaspar and so his comments are irrelevant. Also, Jesse isn't God, so "he" should not be capitalized. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Why is this conversation on my talk page? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

EXPLAINING TO YOU!! READ THIS!

the reference on the content I deleted has no correlation to what was stated in the article.. see for yourself... click on the reference... SiddarthWest (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

"monotheism, belief in the existence of one god, or in the oneness of God. As such, it is distinguished from polytheism, the belief in the existence of many gods, and from atheism, the belief that there is no god. Monotheism characterizes the traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and elements of the belief are discernible in numerous other religions." that's what it says in the reference... Can you read or not? how is Deism, hindusim, Sikhism, Greek, Zoroastrian, Buddhism monotheistic religions? Source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiddarthWest (talk • contribs) 19:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

@SiddarthWest: You don't seem to understand the difference between "Abrahamic" and "monotheistic." All of the Abrahamic religions are monotheisic, but the Abrahamic religions are not the only monotheistic religions. Monotheistic just means a religion believes in only one God. Deism, Zoroastrianism, and Sikhism definitely only have one God, even if they are not Abrahamic. Monotheism is not "exclusively defined" by the Abrahamic religions.

Judging from this, you also don't seem to know what qualifies as vandalism. Go read WP:NOTVAND.

Also, while any information added to the site should cite a professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic source, it's hypocritical for you to demand a source when the erroneous material you added did not have a source either. The material you deleted cited multiple sources, not just Britannica. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand anything at all. How is Hinduism a monotheistic religion? How is Zoroastrian a monotheistic religion? How is Hellenism a monetheistic religion? What's next, Christianity as an atheistic religion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiddarthWest (talk • contribs) 20:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

The only God in Zoroastrianism is Ahura Mazda. The pantheistic forms of Hinduism teach that everything is ultimately just a facet of Brahman (not just monotheism but straight up monism). As for Hellenism, if you bothered to read the article you'd see that it specifies only particular streams in Hellenistic religion, not all Hellenistic religions.

Thinks about this: how many gods are acknowledged in Deism? How many gods did the Hellenistic Hypsistarians worship? And what is the difference between monotheistic religions and Abrahamic religions? Ian.thomson (talk) 20:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok you got me on Zoroastrian... but nearly ALL hindus practice polytheism. Even the sects that say they are monotheistic... the next thing you know they are praying to a plastic idol of X in one temple. Then praying to a plastic idol of Y (another fictional entity) in another temple... you don't call that monotheism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiddarthWest (talk • contribs) 02:09, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

So this is the guy that someone thinks is my sock puppet? Hmmm. Seems like a setup WikiPolices (talk) 07:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC) WikiPolices (talk) 07:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I thought you said you were done editing! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I done editing pages. But not talk pages and the SPI. It is quite late though. WikiPolices (talk) 07:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

So, you're gonna keep this up all night? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Nah.. I'll let other flame baiting Wikipedians suck it up and say whatever they want tonight. They don't got any credibility nor proof. WikiPolices (talk) 07:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@GeneralizationsAreBad: agrees that the diffs are suspicious, so you can ask him about it, because I'm done for tonight. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

SiddarthWest (talk · contribs) was renamed to SiddharthWest (talk · contribs) and is now blocked. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcomes

Hi. I notice you've been leaving a lot of welcome messages, which is great for our new editors. May i suggest you could be careful/selective as you add them, take a look at the contributions of the editors you welcome? I'd point out that on several of the editors' talk pages Cluebot has immediately afterwards left warnings, as i just have, and, in fact, at least one editor you welcomed has immediately been blocked for vandalism. Random or blanket welcomes might well give the wrong impression, don't you think? Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 08:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@LindsayH: Maybe you should focus more on the positive? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I think, maybe, you'll notice i said that what you're doing is great for our new editors; pretty positive, i reckon. I also think, after your discussion with Zzuuzz above, you should take on board the concerns and recognise that welcoming people whose sole contribution has been vandalism is not a good thing. Thanks. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 07:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

You're right, I have made a lot of positive welcomes! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Block on MacTheSlayer

Hi, Quinton Feldberg. I see you recently blocked a user called MacTheSlayer. It appears they are still making a lot of unsouced edits to political pages and they seem to be changing sourced material to represent other ideologies / claims that the citations do not support (as seen on their 'user contributions' page). Not sure if they have got past the block, or maybe a new one should be issued, as they seem to be doing similar stuff to what got them blocked in the first place. Helper201 (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. I don't block people. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Oh right, apologies. Helper201 (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Just to note, Helper201, some of MacTheSlayer's edits are perfectly fine, referenced additions (e.g. at Social Democrats (Ireland). Quinton Feldberg, if reverting what isn't obvious vandalism, please use edit summaries. Regards, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 08:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Another sock of User:PakePakwan

Thank you for you help with User:WikiPolices, he has been blocked. But, the sock is back as User:MrEggWasher, making the same edits at Soanian, Indus Valley Civilization, etc. as well as insults similar to his other accounts. Can you see if this account be blocked? (2600:1001:B016:7DE7:84BD:2F4F:87B3:2FC0 (talk) 11:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC))

sorry

i could make up million reasons why i failed to write that correctly but it will make me look even more stupid. sorry for taking your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GugaKiziria (talk • contribs) 14:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

It's ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 15:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your edits at peripatric speciation! Your reference fixes are greatly appreciated. Cheers! Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 14:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you :)

Many thanks for reaching out to me. I will definitely seek help if needed. Dial911 (talk) 04:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Alpha particle

Not really sure why you did this edit, nothing was broken. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcoming vandals

Hi, when leaving a welcome message on the talk page of a vandal, as you did here, please consider using the {{welcomevandal}} or similar template. If you are a Twinkle user, these templates can be found on the Welcome menu under "problem user welcome templates".

Every one of Ayyappan63's edits have been part of concerted vandalism, and those are the types of nonconstructive edits we do not want to encourage. TJRC (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Hn web marketing

A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Hn web marketing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 09:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Title to be changed

Hi Quinton Quinton Feldberg (talk) Can you help my page title to be replaced from Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Kendra (PMBJK) TO Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Yojana Kendra (PMBJPK) Heres the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pradhan_Mantri_Bhartiya_Jan_Aushadhi_Kendra_(PMBJK) --Shwetamits (talk) 08:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Hn web marketing

A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Hn web marketing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Mean as custard and Jake Brockman: What are these all about? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Not your problem. You appear to have been automatically notified because you edited this page at some point. . . Mean as custard (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

From Jsgoyburu

Hi! I'm not a new user but rather a very specific one. I've been here before and had the same discussion about the article on state sponsored terrorism during Argentina's last military dictatorship, which english wikipedia insists on calling "Dirty War", even though that is a charged and REALLY not neutral term in Argentina, since it's the description of the facts given by the military junta and its apologists.

The introduction of a "military conflict" infobox is, for the same reasons, egregious. I really want to put a POV check on that, but I also don't want to sound like a troll. Should I do it? and,if so, how exactly? (technically, I mean. What would be the correct syntax?) Jsgoyburu (talk) 03:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

You are new. You do not have autoconfirmed rights yet. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Access date

Hi, I don't understand why you removed the accessdate parameter in this edit. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Hmm... Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Quinton Feldberg: are you using some kind of script that removes |accessdate=? If so, it looks as though you're not taking into account |contribution-url=, for example. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Did you mean |chapter-url=? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

chapter-url, chapterurl, contribution-url, section-url, etc. are all synonyms. My recollection is that I saw a change you made where there was |contribution-url=, but I might be wrong. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Attempting to rectify the issue... Quinton Feldberg (talk) 20:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

These edits are still happening. I have reverted two from this morning. Please preview your edits more carefully before saving. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Changing coauthors to vauthors?

A suggestion: I wonder why you are changing coauthors= to vauthors=? Almost nobody uses |vauthors=. A better fix would be to simply remove |coauthors= entirely. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the pro tip! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

"fix citations" edits

Thanks for your many edits to fix citations. You are improving Wikipedia.

I have found a few errors and fixed them. You should see the reverts and fixes in your notifications above. Examples: "date=2013-10" is not a valid format, and |chapter= is not valid in {{cite journal}}. Please preview your edits for red error messages before saving. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Many of your edits are quite helpful, and some are not fixing anything, but I reverted many more today, with explanations in the edit summaries. Please adjust your scripts and preview your edits for reasonableness. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Looking into the issue. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

I have a question

Hi Quinton Feldberg! I have a question and hope that you can help me: On the page Kardinal-Frings-Gymnasium I wanted to use the Template:Interlanguage link, that you can go to several pages, which only exist in German, espacially for notable alumnis. The problem is that the sites of Markus Kurth and Bruno Kahl already exist in English, but not from the persons I need. Becuase of that, the link would go to the wrong page. I hope you have an idea for the problem, thank you and goodbye --KL052 (talk) 23:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

de:Markus Kurth Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Why didn't it work????? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

I tried to use the Template for interlanguage links but that's not possible, when there are different sites with the same name, I think. Thank you for your help!--KL052 (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Issue numbers

Hi there. I see that you are adding issue numbers to some citations in articles. I usually omit them because they are not useful identifiers at least for chemistry articles. Maybe I am missing something though. Journals never cite them that I know of. Cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 08:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia as a source

Hello there I recently edited sayf ibn umar page because of a few issues regarding sources one whole section is referenced solely on Wikipedia and another I did not remove but added to a seperate section as it is an opinion of a researcher and was written in a very strange way not neutral. I have explained this also on talk page of article. 82.132.186.138 (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Infobox Messup

Hi, thanks for welcoming me to the project. I sport of messed up the infobox on the page I'm working on, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch_Mordechai_Ezrachi If you could lend a hand in fixing it that would be awesome. I was trying to add a photo from the commons, and when I saved the edit, it was messed up. Thanks! KatzinDavid (talk) 17:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)katzindavid

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for the welcome message! KWang135 (talk) 03:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Citation changes

Hi, you're continuing to make changes to citations that are incorrect. Consider the change you made at Gladiolus dalenii, where you changed

{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Southern African Gladiolus | work = | publisher = Pacific Bulb Society | date = | url = http://www.pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/index.php/SouthernAfricanGladiolusThree | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2 June 2013 | archiveurl = | archivedate = }}

to

{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | vauthors = | title = Southern African Gladiolus | work = | publisher = Pacific Bulb Society | date = | url = http://www.pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/index.php/SouthernAfricanGladiolusThree | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2 June 2013 | archiveurl = | archivedate = }}

The original would work if |last=, |first= and |coauthors= were completed. Your version won't; |vauthors= doesn't go with |last= and |first= and will throw the error "More than one of author-name-list parameters specified" if they are completed. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Please fix your DOI detection script

See this edit. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Please fix your journal capitalization script, preview your edits, or both

This edit did not fix the journal name.

As above, many of your edits are valuable. Some, however, are pointless (ISBN to isbn) and others are invalid. Please do a better job of previewing your edits. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Invalid author name; please preview your edits

Please preview your edits. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Why are you altering empty parameters to other empty parameters?

For example, this edit. I've seen you do this before: why do you feel that it is necessary to make such changes? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

"fix citations"

When you "fix citations", please check them all to make sure you have actually fixed them and not broken them. In Special:Diff/796756568 you did break one, the Barnes reference. The reason is that, while the {{citation}} template allows both |title= and |work= (the way it was before), or both |chapter= and |title= (the way it is now), it does not allow both |chapter= and |work= (the way you left it). Instead, it ignores the chapter parameter and replaces it with an error message. I have fixed it again, but please be more careful. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:52, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

AWB note

Hi

Thanks for your welcome notes at User talk:DrStrauss (AWB).

Unfortunately, the mere existence of this page makes it crash which is why I moved without a redirect (essentially deleted).

Thanks,

DrStrauss talk 07:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

The Random House Encyclopedia

I'm thinking of reverting your edit as it breaks the ref. Cool? --Mathieu ottawa (talk) 02:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Someone else already did it --Mathieu ottawa (talk) 12:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry that it has come to this

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. See this link for details. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

STOP

Hi Quinton Feldberg - due to this ANI discussion about your semi-automated edits (and their high error rate) I am requesting you STOP making semi-automated edits immediately, and join us at the discussion. If you do not stop, I will block this account temporarily to prevent further disruption. You are currently editing, so I expect you to respond in a timely manner -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 13:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Useless edits are continuing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: I'm a bit concerned that given a lack of any response, that this may have been left as an unattended script... -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 13:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

In that case, a block for operating a bot without approval would be in order, I suppose. I despise WP drama, but so it goes. He has also been adding welcome messages to talk pages of new contributors. I don't know if that is something that could be automated or if there is a way to detect automation in such actions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

WP:BOTBLOCK says indef block, in those cases, btw. If find 3 hours to be a very short time, especially since it can expire without hearing from Quinton. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Continuing to thank blatant vandals isn't going to do any favours here. The account has been editing non-stop since 07:19, 17 August 2017. I would say that's a fairly good indication of automation (or at least being unfit to edit). I would also like to see this block extended for this reason. Otherwise, meet you back here in a few hours. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, this is clearly an unattended bot of some kind. I've reblocked indefinitely, so the user will have to engage with people before resuming editing. Obviously I have no problem with anyone unblocking without talking to me first once such discussion occurs. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: We welcome new users - but non-automatically, and generally after they have already done something useful. See WP:FDB#Welcome bot also Wikipedia:Perennial proposals#Use a bot to welcome new users. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for continuing to make semi-automated edits as per this warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 13:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

You will now not be able to take part in the discussion at ANI. I will unblock you once you agree to not make semi-automated edits until the matter has been resolved -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 13:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Per above, upgraded to indefinite duration. Everything else TNT says remains accurate. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Good call, I used a short block length expecting be to promptly unblocking Quinton after a discussion :( -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 15:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Quinton Feldberg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Script disabled. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

It's kind of annoying that it took a block to stop it, but the block is serving no purpose now that the script is disabled. Obviously you cannot re-enable any unsupervised script until it has WP:BAG approval. And you should address the concerns people have expressed above before editing yourself. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

I will, now that my internet connection is back! Thanks for the quick review! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Forgot to ping the following users

@Mathieu ottawa and Smokefoot: Please read the above section. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Response to all messages regarding citation edits

@Jonesey95, Peter coxhead, Redrose64, Headbomb, and David Eppstein: Sorry for the late response! I was away on vacation, with limited internet access, but had left the script running at home. Only now, after the block did I finally get the necessary level of internet connectivity to connect to my home computer and shut off the script. The script will remain disabled until the necessary improvements are made AND will be edited to allow require previewing prior to submission. Thank you for cleaning up the mistakes! Your reversions are greatly appreciated! Thank you! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC) updated per Jonesey95 (talk · contribs) 04:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Please read Wikipedia:Bot policy. It appears that you were operating an unapproved bot. I believe that your note above should say "will be edited to require previewing prior to submission" unless you would like to go through the bot approval process.

I did not inspect all of your script's edits; there were too many. I am sure that your script made more errors than we detected. It would be a show of good faith and understanding for you to review all of the unattended edits and revert any that we have identified as errors. I would not recommend reverting "useless" changes like "ISBN=" to "isbn=", since they are now water under the bridge, but do try to avoid them in the future. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm working on the improvements right now! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Literally, like, right now! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

From Aononvfnakw

please see the reasoning for my edit to the lgbt rights page here is what I wrote

(please don't add the table back in without an explanation (a key for the table explaining what it means) ---- need a key to explain how this table of checks and X's work (check vs check/X vs X/check vs X meaning)) 

The table doesn't currently make any sense and I've left notes on the talk page, etc and no one has explained it the table should not be included on the page without a key — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aononvfnakw (talk • contribs) 20:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Aononvfnakw (talk · contribs) is now blocked as a sockpuppet of Asnjjasvonk (talk · contribs). Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Quinton,

Just trying to make things as accurate as possible and looking nice but still in the very early stages of editing the page. Thanks for the encouragement and offer of a helping hand. I am sure I will be in touch with questions. I hope you have a great day!

Thank you so much,

USFcougars (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

USFcougars (talk · contribs) is now blocked indefinitely for promotion. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Translation help articles please

Could you translate some articles for me , please ? I need some help to do it.

• fr:Matières utilisées pour fabriquer un film (matters used to make a film)
• fr:Triacétate de cellulose (cellulose triacetate)

2.6.160.56 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

The first article was deleted on frwiki, and the second article already exists on enwiki. Nothing to do. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Citation edits becoming disruptive

Many editors have been posting on your talk page recently, trying to help you improve your editing of citations. You have not heeded our advice. At some point, these editors will lose their patience with your intransigence and you will end up with warnings and possibly a block. Let's work to avoid that unfortunate outcome.

Examples of recent edits (made in the last few hours) that occurred after it was explained to you that such edits are harmful, useless, or are introducing errors:

1. Invalid date (harmful)
2. OCLC= changed to oclc= (useless)
3. ISBN= changed to isbn= (useless)
4. invalid author format (error)
5. removed access-date instead of adding URL (helpful information removed)
6. URL present, but access-date removed

I'm not asking you to be perfect. I also make mistakes. I am simply asking you to avoid making the same mistakes repeatedly, after they have been pointed out to you.

Please stop editing citations until you have adjusted your scripts and your previewing behavior to avoid making the types of edits listed above. Thanks, and you are welcome to ask for any help that you need. Many of us are experienced at editing citation templates, which can be tricky, and are happy to help. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

In example 2 above, you also added |id={{ASIN|0210312149|country=uk}} to a citation - first, there is a special parameter for the ASIN, it is |asin=; second, when an ASIN is purely numeric, and is either 10 or 13 digits long, it is in fact an ISBN - and the citation already had |isbn=978-0210312148, so your addition was entirely redundant. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Pinging Quinton Feldberg: You have made 67 "fix citations" edits since I posted the note above asking you to stop doing so until you fix your scripts and previewing behavior. During that time, you have continued to make errors: incorrect capitalization, broken URL, useless ISBN= to isbn= change (many of these), useless ISSN= to issn= change, invalid author, coauthors= to vauthors=, incorrectly changing hyphen to dash in page numbers, removed access-date with URL present, and introduction of a date error, not to mention the ASIN conversions noted by RedRose64 above.

That is much too high of an error rate, at least 25% in just 67 edits. Please stop editing citations until you have fixed your script and your previewing behavior. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

I have to strongly endorse Jonesey95's comments, and those made here by others. I'm forced to check every time I see you supposedly "fixing" a citation in an article on my watchlist, and far too many of those "fixes" have been wrong. Peter coxhead (talk) 01:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Pinging @Peter coxhead, Redrose64, Headbomb, Amortias, and Mathieu ottawa: as people who have tried to help Quinton Feldberg understand that he is making mistakes. He has made 130+ "fix citations" edits since I posted the second request above. Many of them are, as before erroneous, useless, or both. What is our recourse here? I am not an admin and would like an evaluation from an admin of what sort of reaction is appropriate for this disruptive editing. Am I overreacting? Thanks for any feedback. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

This section regarding bot like editing may be of interest to you Quinton Feldberg. If your rate of editing is high enough and inaccurate enough you should stop doing so until you can fix the underlying issue. If a bot was carrying out the tasks your script was with that high an error rate it would likely be blocked to prevent it from continuously disrupting and/or have approval for the task removed. Amortias (T)(C) 11:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

I haven't the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion on policy/procedure/practice, sorry. --Mathieu ottawa (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Again, please stop breaking citations. You're not fixing them in the first place. See also [1] and [2]. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amortias: As it turns out, there exists a bot, Citation bot (talk · contribs), whose purpose is to fix citations. And has made a number of similar errors. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

As far as I know, "Citation bot" doesn't actually run in bot mode anymore. I believe that it edits only when activated on a per-article basis by individual editors, who click a link or tool to run it on that article. I just ran it myself on Rupert Vansittart. Unless the bot is truly running unattended, which I'm pretty sure it has not done in years, editors are still responsible for the edits they make, even if "Citation bot" is credited with the edit. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Might not be automatic, but the errors are still 100% real. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Many of these are known bugs that have been fixed in sandbox code by volunteers, but we have been unable to get the new code uploaded for a long time now. The long-time maintainer is no longer active regularly on WP. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Well, that's too bad. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it also changes coauthors to vauthors. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

section blanking as well. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Serious question

Hey Quinton Feldberg, I left you lots of messages, but maybe you don't look at old ones, so I will say this again: How was it vandalism that I did on "The Lorax" and "Jeopardy!"? Also, and I said this before, are you male or female because I want to have a better picture of you in my mind. Also, what's your race and skin color? No offense!--Gibberish eaters (talk) 12:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

I thought I already answered all of those questions. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 13:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

@Gibberish eaters: your edits to The Lorax (film) and Jeopardy! were NOT vandalism and have been  restored. As you can probably guess from my username, I am male. Do you know of any women named Quinton? Why do you need to know my "race and skin color", and aren't they the same thing? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Actually, your edit to Jeopardy! was vandalism and was re-reverted by another editor. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:57, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

LTA

Hello. I notice you archived Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Wikidesctruction as inactive. This caught my eye because I blocked this vandal only yesterday, and in fact the preceding diff shows someone listing the IP they were using, yesterday. LTA of course needs to be tidied up occasionally, but I wanted to let you know that this is an advanced topic and things are not always what they seem, and even if the page hasn't been updated recently it is always worth checking with regular editors to the page. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:19, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

 Restored Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Restoration is something I can do myself. Comprehension of the issues involved is the thing that needs to be done. I see this page lists a lifespan of 2008-2010, and I AGF that that's the thing you used. There's no way you could known about the block I placed, but a quick glance at the page history, and indeed the page itself would show recent activity. Even cases which might not appear active - WP:LTA/MG for example - have been recently active. That's why I say it's an advanced topic and usually requires various checks. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I see... Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you! GrammerCracker96 (talk) 23:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Nate Speed

Eh, I can be stupidly optimistic sometimes. :) Trivialist (talk) 01:10, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleted talkpage comments

The same IP address reverted two comments I left on two separate talkpages, which you thankfully restored. Could this be a coincidence, or am I being harassed?Zigzig20s (talk) 07:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Probably a coincidence, since the IP address you linked belongs to the "derp" vandal bot. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

OK. Hopefully this won't happen again...Zigzig20s (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I hope so too! The admins are trying to get the situation under control as we speak! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

• Hey, I ran into you a couple of days ago, with those IPs in the 54 range vandalizing the joint. I appreciate your help--I suppose you figured out, just like I did, how their editing pattern could be identified. Anywayz, I was looking at Sir Wilfrid Laurier School Board, which had been attacked by one of those IPs, and I saw that you had reverted them a few times but you also reinstated their addition, like here. I don't know why you did that, maybe it was an accidental rollback in the flurry, but it contained a pretty serious BLP violation, or at least it looks like it did, and I just wanted you to know that. Thanks again, and take care, Drmies (talk) 14:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

• Yes. I made a mistake but immediately self-reverted both times. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your revent on the Spanish Typhoon.60.53.51.122 (talk) 06:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 06:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Look at the Spanish Typhoon again, The Assamble was made in spain and it is still made in Multinational. How could be impossible ?.60.53.51.122 (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Question

Hi User:Quinton Feldberg, basically, in the TV version of The Walking Dead the character Jesus (The Walking Dead) has the last name "Rovia", but is played by a white British actor (the character is American, maybe from Washington). I just wondered where the character is meant to be from? He is obviously white, but which ancestry? If you can't answer, do you know which Wikipedians can please? Thanks. --Theo Mandela (talk) 05:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

• News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL

• In the media: Monkey settlement; Wikipedia used to give AI context clues

• Humour: Chickenz

• Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe

• Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications

• Gallery: Chicken mania

• Special report: Two steps forward, one step backward: The Sustainability Initiative

• Traffic report: Fights and frights

• Featured content: Flying high

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Email from CMCreator900

Hey Quinton,

Hope you’re doing well.

I came across your user page doing some research as I noticed you edited Meek Mill’s page recently.

I am working on a blog about Wikipedia and wanted to see if this is something you’d be open to getting involved with. It is a blog that will talk about best practices on Wikipedia, put the spotlight on Wikipedians, etc. If you’re interested, feel free to email me back: cmcreator900gmail.com and we can discuss further. Looking forward to it.

I also have some opportunities for paid editing (in accordance with guidelines, of course) that I wanted to discuss. Let me know.

CMCreator900 (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

@CMCreator900: Thanks for emailing me! Unfortunately, I'm not very active right now. My only involvement on the page was a few reversions of a block evading sock of John Kwiecinski (talk · contribs). Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

CMCreator900 (talk · contribs) is now blocked indefinitely for socking. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Shuga

@Quinton Feldberg: Hi Quinton, I hope you are well.

I have just noticed that the editing work that i have done on the Shuga wikipedia page has all been reverted.

I have provided citations and LINKS to all of the changes I made as well as information as to why each change was made.

Can you please inform me as to what I did that was wrong please so that I can avoid making similar mistakes in the future? If you are able to revert the page to the changes I have made that would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks and looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Bhaz26 Bhaz26 (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC) Bhaz26 (talk) 17:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Possible sock. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:My 4G has only 2 bars

Hello Quinton Feldberg. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:My 4G has only 2 bars, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This talk page and its history are useful for for identifying the sockmaster and their sockpuppets. See WP:DELTALK. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

The Christian O’Connell Breakfast Show

Hello Quinton Feldberg, I write following your message informing me that my amendments were not “constructive”. I would like to make you aware that I am a listen if the show in question and although you may think they are not constructive they are accurate. In fact more accurate than what was previously posted.

Best wishes C Clandy1979 (talk) 20:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

 Restored Quinton Feldberg (talk) 20:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Stop

Stop editing my user page.--Syong Lee (talk) 04:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Sock. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

It's wrong right! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

You just proved me right.--Syong Lee (talk) 04:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

re:October 2017

I don't understand why. It's an actual story, and spars well with the other content in that section. Source: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/jesse-watters-reads-text-sent-mid-show-from-his-mom-what-r-u-talking-about/

--SchutteGod (not logged in) 2605:E000:1703:88:5E9:E96D:7C92:CD98 (talk) 02:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

@SchutteGod:  Warning removed Quinton Feldberg (talk) 13:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

How to report an individual?

I saw you had reported that user who kept vandalizing the Mubariz Ibrahimov page. How did you do it? i have an ip that is constantly removing things from the talk page because they disagree with it and i feel they are going to change the article back to that previous users edits. Ninetoyadome (talk) 20:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

If you haven't already, go to preferences, go to the gadgets tab, and enable Twinkle. Then go to that user's user/talk/conribs page and clink "ARV". Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

 Blocked by Widr (talk · contribs). Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank You. Ninetoyadome (talk) 21:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey why delete my Edit

u cant delte something u dont know why its not constructive for you? because u like it? since when u got pope? secondly the ref show how true they are! sorry but u cant do this this is a free ecyclopedia for everyone not just for you and your own ideas. he had wrote so much u cant just undo everything. go read that story come back and edit that parts thats not true u cant just delte everything! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatolian Eagle (talk • contribs) 21:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Sock. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Need help to fix the Pakistan Navy asset list page

Hi Quinton,

I spent Saturday / Sunday to fix up Pakistan Navy Assets list (Frigates / Boats / Ships) and also added 2-3 Reference links per addition however I was noticing someone by the name of Dustam Khan / Adamgerber80 keep sabotaging teh pages and reverting it back to data which is 5-8 years old

HELP is required to get rid of trouble makers

I had added information on

Frigates Submarines Missile boats Fleet Tankers Upcoming Under construction Projects (Approved projects) Added names of actual ships

I have added references from news sites , defence journals and good quality data not sure what is the problem with these Dustam Khan and Admgerber80

sky1two — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sky1two (talk • contribs) 23:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Dustum Khan (talk · contribs) was blocked as a sockpuppet. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Quinton. In the future, could you please refrain from tagging socks' userpages? That is a task for admins, clerks, and CUs. Regards, GAB^gab 15:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)