User talk:QuinceWyss

Peak Studios

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peak Studios, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://peakstudios.com/peak-studios. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello, QuinceWyss. Concerning your contribution, Peak Studios, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://peakstudios.com/peak-studios. As a copyright violation, Peak Studios appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Peak Studios has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Peak Studios and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Peak Studios with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Peak Studios.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peak studios

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peak studios, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://peakstudios.com/peak-studios. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Peak studios

A tag has been placed on Peak studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 16:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peak Studios

A tag has been placed on Peak Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WhaleyTim (talk) 17:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Peak studios

A tag has been placed on Peak studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 23:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have speedily deleted the pages Peak Studios and Peak studios, and protected them from re-creation; it was an article about a company that in no way explained how the company was notable (have a look at the notability guidelines for companies and other organizations). If you are affiliated with the company, then please note that Wikipedia is not a directory or an advertising board; it is an encyclopedia, in other words, a compendium of existing knowledge, and not a means of making something known. (If you disagree with the deletion and are able to establish the company's notability, you can challenge it at deletion review.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. See WP:POINT. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

You suffer from a conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not to be used for marketing. Please read WP:BFAQ which explains this and more in detail. Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection request

I've declined this -- you can't seek protection for a page that doesn't exist. And, for the various reasons stated above, I support the deletion of your proposed page as being about a nonnotable company (see WP:CORP and WP:V). And yes, I live in the United States. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine I am all for the inatitave to make Wikipedia un-notable in any class room worldwide! You guys are a joke. I looked at the list of post you have started and many were not notable by the terms you have deemed my company to be not notable! Where do we report admin abuse?

Have you even read WP:BFAQ? Please do not edit further without reading the policies and guidelines we have pointed out to you. Wikipedia is not to be used for marketing. --Yamla (talk) 18:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Admin abuse

A tag has been placed on Admin abuse, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]