User talk:QubixQdotta

Ways to improve Lunada Bay Boys

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. QubixQdotta, thanks for creating Lunada Bay Boys!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Surfs up

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem man, I appreciate it. Article is incomplete. This is only a quarter of coverage the surf crew has. It doesn't end really. [qub/x q;o++a] ++ 04:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qbix, just out of curiosity, have you ever surfed Lunada? I'm guessing you have not, but I think you might have the wrong idea about what goes on there. The surf itself is fantastic: long workable rides with a right-hand break. The problem is this attracts every kook from Huntington to Santa Barbara. They litter, change into their wetsuits in front of people's homes, and then are unsafe out in the water. Someone has to keep order and keep things safe. If you can find a local to take you, and show respect, you might be surprised. Please don't believe everything you read in the papers. The people there are more than ready to deal with all kinds of visitors - both respectful and disrespectful. Without order, it would be chaotic and the simple fact is you EARN your right to surf there. 2602:301:772D:62D0:DCA6:2CD1:B9DE:EBFC (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just a historian of SoCal culture dude. I'm presenting information in the article based on the sources I have, and the fact of the matter is the Bay Boys have a record for all the things localism entails. Localism works, it keeps beaches clean and non-crowded - and you guys take it to an extreme not found on other beaches. Here on Wikipedia, we strive for neutral point of view which includes all sides of its subjects that have been supported by reliable sources. If you dig in the article you'll notice key points from locals which express your sentiments. [qub/x q;o++a] ++ 19:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its all good. I appreciate what you are attempting to do. What bothers me are the kooks who think they have the right to surf Lunada just because it's a public beach. It doesn't work that way. If someone set up a tent and started camping in your front yard, you would understandably be pissed and probably not hesitate to use violence to get rid of them. It's the same concept. People are trying to surf where they have no right to. 2600:1012:B013:C818:A8A8:6211:1FBB:4863 (talk) 20:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Electric Daisy Carnival Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Electric Daisy Carnival Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, QubixQdotta. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago Outfit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burbank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Aryan Brotherhood shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 04:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, QubixQdotta. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 10:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Juggalo gang subsets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Juggalo gang subsets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Juggalo gang subsets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Crips subgroups

The article List of Crips subgroups has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has exactly the same WP:NOTDIR and WP:OR problems that led to List of Bloods subgroups being deleted at AfD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of peckerwood gangs

The article List of peckerwood gangs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has exactly the same WP:OR and WP:NOTDIR problems that lead to List of Bloods subgroups being deleted at AfD. The prose part of this article is already present at peckerwood, so there is nothing salvageable here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]