User talk:Quartzgoldbling

Welcome!

Hello, Quartzgoldbling, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Triple Nine Society. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Woerich (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Quartzgoldbling, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Canada Christian College have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 00:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 00:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Quartzgoldbling, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Bias"

Just to clarify on what you are alleging to be a "soft bias" - a phrase stating the CCC was not affiliated to OISE was in the paragraph previously - I just cleaned it up so that it wasn't parenthetical ie so it was a separate sentence making the paragraph easier to read. I suspect whoever initially put in the mention did so because OISE is considered left-wing and "radical" (and has been a target of criticism in recent years by Charles McVety) and an editor wanted to make it clear CCC had no relationship other than to rent space so that CCC wouldn't be tainted by association with OISE in a reader's mind. So if there's a "bias" behind the sentence's initial inclusion it wasn't an anti-CCC bias but an anti-OISE bias. I added the reference to McMaster because it seemed odd to mention there was no affiliation with OISE without saying the same of McMaster (and indeed, mentioning one but not the other might suggest there was an affiliation with McMaster. The non-affiliation is a logical inference - but there was no actual source for it - so I'm fine leaving it out. I just wanted to clear up your misapprehension of bias. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "handwaving" but your suggestion doesn't appear valid looking up the definition since nothing was being "glossed over".[1]

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

You seem to have previously contributed to the article Christianity and Islam.

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find you interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]