User talk:Quark7

Welcome!

Hello, Quark7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mperry (talk • contribs)

Center for Immigration Studies

Please take it to the talk page, rather than just removng sourced statements. Doing otherwise could be construed as edit warring and vandalism. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From where I sit, it's your reverts of my edits that could be construed as edit warring. As I repeatedly explained in my edit summaries, my edits are based on the dictionary - and WP article - definition of the word "nonpartisan." As NPOV as you can get. Ron (talk) 04:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then it should be easy to provide third party sources to back up what you are trying to insert then. I have sourced the article, you are purely trying to remove sourcing. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 05:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did exactly that, and you removed it. Your sources are not RS and not NPOV.

Ron (talk) 11:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to the talk page of the article. Otherwise is edit warring, since you are not discussing anything there. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 16:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ron (talk) 04:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Bilbray content removal

I'm not sure I agree with your content removal on Brian Bilbray. I didn't revert, but I started a conversation on the article's talk page. Can you weigh in there? Arbor8 (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, done (BTW, cute cartoon, and so true) Ron (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Immigration Studies (July 2013)

Per WP:REVEXP, please don't revert good-faith edits without explanation. I'm reviving the discussion over CIS's partisan identifier here. --Nstrauss (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They did not appear to be good-faith edits. For example, you removed "nonpartisan" because it was "contradictory" without identifying what it contradicted, and you made other changes, including removing citations, claiming that you explained the changes on the talk page even though you didn't. Quark7 (talk) 14:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the United States v. Wong Kim Ark page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wong Kim Ark

I agree with some of your recent edits to Wong Kim Ark and will probably support them if they are challenged. But did you really intend to remove all of the material that you removed? Please review your edits to make sure. Thanks.Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great catch! I have no clue how most of those changes got in my edits. Thanks much!--Quark7 (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Quark7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Quark7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Quark7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]