Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! scope_creep (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Qualifications, How are you? I don't think we have spoken before. The forbes sites subdomain is a webhosting site, for companies looking to host there own content and advertise it. Advertising kit It is advertising which asserts WP:NOTADVERTISING. Welcome to Wikipedia. scope_creep (talk) 08:54, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Scope creep:, Thanks. My question was due to the fact that this link is from the Forbes mainspace, not a subdomain, and by an editor and member of staff, rather than a random marketing contributor. So I thought it looked okay.
Another unrelated question: in a biography, are a few primary sources viewed as acceptable so long as there are still sufficient reliable secondary sources to fall back on?
wp-notability: "Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject."
I found out about it being RS as she is a member of the company, although it is curious that there seems to be 41, 30 under 30 lists published every year, which makes their value as a ref dubious at best. scope_creep (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
