User talk:Quadibloc
Welcome!
Hello, Quadibloc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Hello! Great start to an article. I'd like to nominate it for a did you know? on Wikipedia's main page. To do that though, the article needs some improvement. For your references, can you include inline citations? I can help you do this if you can mark the parts of your text that reference each citation and then I can wikify the article for you. Thanks.--v/r - TP 22:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Most of the article consists of very basic information on the Monotype system that is found in each of the sources cited. That's why they were listed as overall references instead of being created using "ref" tags. --Quadibloc (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I kinda figured as much but the DYK process includes a bit of evaluation of the article and they are going to be looking for inline refs. If it's possible to do them, I think it'd easily be possible to do a DYK for this article. I found the 2nd ref on Google books, I'm trying to see what I can do to help.--v/r - TP 22:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks; right now, while the article is bigger than a stub, though, it's very much incomplete as it stands. Eventually, especially if others interested in the subject contribute, it may be possible to get it to the point where it is comparable to the Linotype machine article. Then it could be subjected to evaluation. --Quadibloc (talk) 03:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it won't be a DYK candidate at that point. DYK must be done within the first 5 days an article is created or substantially expanded (fivefold). The purpose of DYK is to bring attention to new material. I was trying to see if I could work something out with it, but I dont have access to refs 1 and 3 so I can't add inline citations myself. That's alright though, thanks anyway.--v/r - TP 13:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks; right now, while the article is bigger than a stub, though, it's very much incomplete as it stands. Eventually, especially if others interested in the subject contribute, it may be possible to get it to the point where it is comparable to the Linotype machine article. Then it could be subjected to evaluation. --Quadibloc (talk) 03:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
[edit]
Hi, Quadibloc! I noticed that an image you authored needs a correction. File:Sidereal Time en.PNG shows three images of the Sun, accompanied by an orange dot for reference. The final two look the same, but actually the first and third should be the ones that look the same. The third image on the right, of the yellow Sun with reference orange dot, marked 12:00:00, ought to match the first image, also marked 12:00:00. I don't know how to fix it myself - can you do it? Thanks, Dc3~enwiki (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I didn't author that image, I only made a different small fix to it. The diagrams of how the Sun appears, with the orange dot representing a star, are actually correct. The first diagram shows the Sun occluding the star. The second diagram shows the situation one sidereal day later; the star has returned to the position the Sun occupied, but the Sun lags behind due to the Earth's orbital motion around the Sun. The third diagram shows the situation after 24 hours; now the Sun has returned to its original position - since that is only four minutes later than the second diagram, the difference between the positions of the star and the Sun has not changed appreciably. 198.161.203.6 (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Oh, I see. Thanks for explaining. I interpreted the orange dot as a reference point on Earth, such as a stop sign. And I totally missed the cues from the gray road, which is the actual reference point on Earth --oops. I didn't get the star being occluded --since the dot appears visible in the first frame, I took it to be in front of the Sun. I guess we're supposed to picture the orange star as being seen "through the Sun". Can we add that to the caption for the illustration? Dc3~enwiki (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Quadibloc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Despite being logged in, I cannot edit from 199.7.159.0/25. This IP is how my mobile phone connects to the Internet; it is not an open proxy. I am not the editor respnsible for the disruptive editing cited in the block.
Accept reason:
WP:IPEXEMPTgranted. See below. Carry on. If you have any more trouble, let me know. Jayron32 22:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The block should have been set as "anon only", which means that it wouldn't affect accounts editing from there; I'm double checking with the blocking admin before actually changing the block. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- I've issued this user the IP Block Exempt status. This is not the person who was supposed to be caught by the rangeblock. Please read WP:IPEXEMPT for an understanding about the rights and responsibilities of this status. As this is clearly a good-faith editor caught by a block intended for someone else, I feel comfortable granting this flag. --Jayron32 22:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Sidereal Time en.PNG - to Commons please
[edit]Hello,
Will you upload this image or its SVG version into Commons? Other Wikipedias can use it then. Thanks. Misibacsi (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not its author. I only made a small change to it. Quadibloc (talk) 07:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Quadibloc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Quadibloc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Quadibloc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)