User talk:Qatarihistorian

September 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sultanate of Rum. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Review my actions. Thank you. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:33, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent battleground attitude, edit-warring and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qatarihistorian. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 12:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've extended to indef. After the two month period, if they haven't socked yet more as an IP, then they might ask for an unblock and assuming they have sufficient clue, I will leave it to the good judgement of the reviewing admin. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]