User talk:QWERTYtheman

This information was always deleted from the main AOG PAge. It is legitimate information.

Speedy deletion of Assemblies of God Scandals

A tag has been placed on Assemblies of God Scandals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Booglamay (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Assemblies of God Scandals. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Booglamay (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Richard G. Gotti. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 05:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Gotti. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gene Gotti, you will be blocked from editing. Dravecky (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John A. Gotti, you will be blocked from editing. Dravecky (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Gotti Agnello. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 05:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Gotti Agnello, you will be blocked from editing. Dravecky (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Victoria Gotti, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 05:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Castellano, you will be blocked from editing. Dravecky (talk) 06:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Gotti, you will be blocked from editing. Dravecky (talk) 06:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HelloThereNow

Pardon me, but did you formerly edit under the name HelloThereNow? I noticed that your editing style, topic selection, and writing style are all markedly similar to this editor. I also noticed that your editing started the day after his editing came to an end. Just wondering. - Dravecky (talk) 08:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]