User talk:Pythagimedes

Cookies for you!

		Cookies!
		Biochemistry&Love has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thank you kindly for your input on a discussion with me on a Talk page. Wikipedia needs more editors like you that are willing to agree to disagree. Keep up the good work! ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 19:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC) To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hypatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Great Books

Why did you remove the word "dismal" altogether from my narrative? How would you feel if you had worked on something for two years, and it had amounted to nearly nothing? Heartsick. You would feel heartsick. 2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68 (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68: My apologies. Based on the WP Manual of Style, articles should not be written like a narrative. The standard is to write dispassionately without adding emotional language. Also, everything you write on wikipedia can be edited freely by other people when appropriate, so it is not really your narrative anyway, although I completely understand why you would feel attached to it. Pythagimedes (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

What kind of response is that? We are not "writing an article" on your talk page, and yet not only do you remain "dispassionate", you refer to the wrong emotional issue in my complaint! 2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68 (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68: My response above was to your original question asking why I removed the word "dismal" from an article. I was not talking about my talk page. I removed the word "dismal" from the article in question, because I felt it was inconsistent with Wikipedia's encyclopedic tone, which is dispassionate. Pythagimedes (talk) 02:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

I already know your response was to the article and not to the talk page! My question for you was and is: Why did you respond to the article and not recognize the emotional issue presented on your talk page about the article. Even failures at clerical work have their hard moments. Has Wikipedia become this much a grind that our feelings about sharing knowledge with others has its end in "take it up with the union rep?" or something? Vargas Milan, 3:58a EST, 11 Feb 2021. (2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68 (talk))

Pythagimedes, I apologize. I hit a friend yesterday because I thought he wasn't listening, but he was, and now there's you too, and I'm really sorry. I kind of a have a marathon runner mentality, and I thought others had it too, so I'm really sorry I gave you a smack. If there's anything you need, write me back, and I'll try and pay you back.

Sorry again for not listening. Vargas Milan 2600:1700:C690:3640:C871:F420:88A0:4F68 (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fenghuang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symbolism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Native American Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hide.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)