User talk:Pvrmagesh

Hi Mike Rosoft, The page I have posted is for a famous artist Jeeva Nanthan.

Given below are few links for his pages. http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/jeeva-nandam.html http://jeevartistjeeva.blogspot.com/ http://www.facebook.com/jeevartist?sk=info http://www.facebook.com/pages/%E0%AE%93%E0%AE%B5%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF%E0%AE%B0%E0%AF%8D-%E0%AE%9C%E0%AF%80%E0%AE%B5%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%A9%E0%AE%A8%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%A9%E0%AF%8D-Artist-Jeeva-Nanthan/140419002684180

The reason I created the page was he just won a National (Indian) award for his book "Thiraiseelai" - which means "Curtain". Given below is the proof. http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?722466

I'm contacting him for his personal information. Details like his family and his background will be added later once he gives me the complete information. For now I request you to Undelete the page so that I can add additional details to what's written.

Thanks and Regards Magi. A

I have restored the artice into your subpage as User:Pvrmagesh/Jeeva Artist for you to work on. Please be aware, though, that Wikipedia articles - especially articles about living people - need to be verifiable using reliable third-party sources. (The coverage in reliable ources is also the primary notability criterion.)
The relevant policies and guidelines include:
- Verifiability (and the related guideline on reliable sources);
- Notability.

Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeeva Artist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeeva Artist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeeva Artist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:17, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks!!!

Thanks to you, too, for taking the time to read that link and for dramatically expanding and improving the Jeeva article. It looks far better now. For future reference, if you want to indicate that you're still building an article but you want to save a short first revision, just add {{underconstruction}} to the top of the article. All the best, A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 22:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oviyar Jeeva

Hi,

The article oviyar Jeeva has been nominated for deletion. I have voted keep citing the relevant wikipedia policies and explaining how he is notable. I have also formatted and copy edited the article to suit wikipedia's writing style. Let me know if you need any more help with this article--Sodabottle (talk) 08:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the image of jeeva. You can add an image to wikipedia if a) it is an image taken by you or b) if you have permission from the photographer to release the image under a creative commons licence. Wikipedia operates by american copyright laws and they are strict. If you have an image taken by yourself, you can upload directly. But if you are going to use image of others, obtain email permission from them in the format prescribed in WP:PERMISSION. Once done you can upload the file through the link "upload file" in the toolbox menu in the left panel. After uploading place the file name in the infobox's "image" field.--Sodabottle (talk) 17:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

You can find live help on Wikipedia's
help chat

Hello, Pvrmagesh. Someone has replied to your request for feedback.
Best regards, the Wikipedia requests for feedback team.

How references work

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Pvrmagesh/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 19:17, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 23 June 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:17, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]