User talk:Pvcblue/Archive02

ATTN: BOTH cases closed and found "unfounded" by Admins

Re: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pvcblue (2nd)

You have placed a sockpuppet thing on my talk page - I don't know who these people are but I do know that a[n] admin themselves locked the first accusation as it was unworthy and unproven. I don't know who you are (appareantly (sic) a[n] admin?) but you can also file a harrasment (sic) accusation against the person who started this whole thing - user Fram. Pvcblue 13:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The boilerplate says suspected; it remains to be determined whether it is you who has been inserting links repeatedly in to The Smurfs article. Please confine any comments regarding this matter to the above-linked case page. If you feel that you are being harrassed by another editor then please look at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes for details. Regards, (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pvcblue (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. (aeropagitica) (talk) 08:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from front user page

It is suspected or confirmed that this user is the puppet master of one or more abusive or block / ban evading sock puppets.
See block log, list of suspected puppets and list of confirmed puppets.
The use of abusive sockpuppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sockpuppets
to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pvcblue for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Fram 09:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]