User talk:Puunanny

Proposed deletion of John Flacker

Hello, Puunanny. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, John Flacker, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want John Flacker to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Flacker

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as John Flacker, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Finngall ^talk 06:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 06:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Freddy yao

The article Freddy yao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY having never played in a fully professional league or in a senior international fixture.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosack (talk) 09:56, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy, for disruptive editing, and for making personal attacks (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Swarm ♠ 05:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]