User talk:Purpler0ckofficial

May 2011

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Purpler0ckofficialwiki. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Purpler0ckofficialwiki, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Do not start articles about yourself, your YouTube page, your company, or any other subject you have a conflict of interest with. —C.Fred (talk) 20:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:C.Fred, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Wasbeer 20:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:51, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Purpler0ckofficial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand now your reasons for being blocked, and I hope to contribute helpfully to Wikipedia in the future. I am sorry Ohnoitsjamie. I never intended vandalism, but I only wished to contribute which, regretfully, is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Thank you for your time, and I hope you consider unblocking me PROF 16:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"never intended vandalism"?? You continally blanked a user's page; you started a list of "shameless users" contrary to WP:NPA/WP:CIVIL; you completely ignored recommendations to not follow a specific path, then attacked those who were kind enough to provide that guidance. No thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.