User talk:Pumpum123

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page The Bumblebeez has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing The Bumblebeez

Hello, Pumpum123. You have new messages at Etrigan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Etrigan (talk) 09:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Pumpum123. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

08:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

I see you have been editing the article for The Bumblebeez. I have been reverting your edits because either the edits you make render the article into a non-functional state or you add a great deal of unsourced material. Wikipedia is based on information that is gleaned from reliable sources, making the information verifiable. I would suggest you make small edits at a time, and when doing so, include a reference from a reliable source to back up the information you are adding. I understand that the article already contains a great deal of unreferenced info, but we don't need to make it worse. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Angryapathy (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Bumblebeez, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Bumblebeez was changed by Pumpum123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976142 on 2011-09-06T14:13:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Bumblebeez, you may be blocked from editing. Angryapathy (talk) 16:29, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bumblebeez

If you wish to make sweeping edits to The Bumblebeez, please discuss on the talk page or find citations to back the information up. I have reverted your edits once again. Angryapathy (talk) 14:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Transscribed from Angryapathy's talk page) the edits you have are negative and wrong they did not get booed of at radiohead,so how can you say this?there is no fact! you are a hypocrite let people be and dont be negative,why does the world need more negativity?? the information is correct. so please stop being such a nazi thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpum123 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are repeatedly attempting to add unsourced information to the article. If the info is true, then please find a reliable source to back it up. Wikipedia is based on verifiablity, not truth. I saw that the Radiohead bit was not sourced properly and was removed. I agree that the article needs a lot of work, and when I get time I will go through the sources provided to check if the information is properly reflected, and look for new sources.

To answer your question, my "agenda" is to ensure that the article adheres to Wikipedia standards. I suggest you read WP:PILLARS so you can better understand the website to which you are trying to edit. Also, if you revert back to the same page without adding sources, you could be in violation of Wikipedia's three revert rule, which could result in a block of editing privledges. I also wish to improve this article, but it needs to be done following Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Angryapathy (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for unhelpful editing of various kinds, including edit warring, violation of the policy on neutral point of view, personal attacks, and unambiguous vandalism (e.g this edit and repeatedly adding "working with various other artists from all over Earth and other planets and galaxies" to an article). Please try to edit in collaboration with other editors, rather than with a battleground mentality, or there is a serious risk that you will be blocked for longer. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]