User talk:Pulsetech

TUT TUT TUT

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to John Legend. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Mdsummermsw, I asked for information regarding Blogs & posting their links on your talk page, but you seemed a little to busy taking down Youtube links to get back to me. I asked where I can start a discussion about the relevance of Blog information as Blogs such as Concrete Loop & Rap-Up are constantly referenced without questioning. This seems a lot like a dictatorship to me.

At the top of my talk page it says, "Questions you ask here will be answered here." You stated that you understood the rules regarding posting unreliable sources/blogs/etc. but that you wished to know how to open the discussion on how to change this. Please review my response for details.

I am sorry that you feel wikipedia's rules are an undue burden. Like all sites, wikipedia has rules. As with other sites, you are obligated to follow the rules or not use the site. Unlike other sites, you do have the option to organize a movement to change virtually any rule. In the meanwhile, though, you remain subject to the site's rules. Keep in mind that verifiability is one of Wikipedia's three core content policies. Making changes to these policies is likely to be a long and difficult process. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you would edit an older version of someones talk page, as you did with this edit to my talk page. Deletion from talk pages is disruptive. Please try to avoid making this mistake in the future. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]