User talk:Pulakhandams

May 2021

Hello, I'm Ugog Nizdast. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Polycystic ovary syndrome have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Hip fracture. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

warning about spam links to Yashoda Hospitals

and more

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.

AdithyaKL (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AdithyaKL,

Is the links not relevant to the users? Pulakhandams (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pulakhandams You are using wikipedia to promote and advertise something else. That's not allowed regardless of its utility and relevance to users. See the links in my last comment. If the content on those pages is useful, add the text to wikipedia following their license terms on your own discretion. AdithyaKL (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AdithyaKL,

I don't Agree with your comments but my intension is to giving the best info to the users and that to from the trust worthy websites is that wrong, please let me know. I don't have any other intension here. If it is not relevant to the page content you can remove. I don't want to promote or advertise here. Pulakhandams (talk) 07:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pulakhandams

My bad if I misunderstood your intentions.

See this part

Contribute cited text, not bare links. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a link farm. If you have a source to contribute, first contribute some facts that you learned from that source, then cite the source. Do not simply direct readers to another site for the useful facts; add useful facts to the article, then cite the site where you found them. You are here to improve Wikipedia—not just to funnel readers off Wikipedia and onto some other site, right? (If not, see No. 1 above.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam#How_not_to_be_a_spammer

Cheers AdithyaKL (talk) 09:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]