User talk:Pug of the day
Pug of the day, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Pug of the day! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC) |
Rhodes Scholarship
[edit]Hi there, can you clarify the following wording, which you recently added to Rhodes Scholarship?
"Dr Salem Yusef, an Indian Scholar, conducted significant research into respiratory health and its relationship to developing economies. He shifts in the developing world, particularly dietary changes and increased urbanisation to higher incidences of heart attacks and strokes."
That "he shifts" business isn't making sense... is it missing a few words? Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Well this is embarrassing.@Jessicapierce: It was missing a few words I am afraid. Well spotted. Sorry about that.Pug of the day (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordonstoun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Hogan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Academic halls
[edit]Hi, I see you are interested in the St Edmund Hall article. If you find any more general information, you are welcome to add it to Academic halls of the University of Oxford, which I wrote last year. TSventon (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- For sure, Emden delves into general 11th and 12th century student accomodation at Oxford in some of his writings on St Edmunds.Pug of the day (talk) 13:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malik Al Nasir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Alexander van Akkooi for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander van Akkooi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Blue Riband► 15:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Nomination of Globalance for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globalance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.