User talk:Publicdefender99

Before you remove content from the Cerritos page, please explain your reasoning on the talk page. After a consensus to formed, then the content can be removed. If have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page! =D Jumping cheese ^Contact 22:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cerritos, California

Re: your repeated deletions of the properly sourced Cerritos, California#City Council Controversy section, and your query: "perhaps we can come to some kind of an agreement?"

Perhaps you can explain your repeated deletion of the section, especially since you never explained anything in your edit summaries or on the article's talk page. Is the information untrue or misleading? Are there any other reasons that you are deleting the information?

I have set up a section on the talk page for the Cerritos article if you want to discuss the matter. Please join the discussion at Talk:Cerritos, California#City Council Controversy.

Several politicians, their staff members, and their supporters have already ended up in the press for editing on the Wikipedia, and especially for the deletion of true, but negative information. I would not be surprised to see information about this editing dispute eventually end up at Long Beach Press-Telegram, the Los Angeles Times, and/or the Orange County Register. ^Blank ^Verse 08:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Cerritos, California. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jumping cheese ^Contact 05:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Cerritos, California, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Jumping cheese ^Contact 23:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a complete case for content removal before you do so. You have removed the "city council controversy" section nine times now. Please stop. Go to the Cerritos talk page and explain your reasoning. Thank you. Jumping cheese ^Contact 04:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Thanks for leaving me a message on my talk page (please remember to sign your comments with ~~~~). The "City Council Controversy" section is a rather major issue in the Cerritos history. It'll probably stay there indefinitely (it's not for elections...wikipedia doesn't usually swing that way). Please explain on the Cerritos talk page why you feel so strongly against including the section before removing it again. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message! =D Jumping cheese ^Contact 06:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to revert your edits again. Please, PLEASE explain you rationale on the Cerritos talk page before removing the section. After a consensus is settled, then the appropriate edits can be made. Jumping cheese ^Contact 06:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

note: A section on political controversies is pretty common for Wikipedia city articles where there have been controversies. For example, see Huntington Beach, California#City government controversies and Compton, California#City Government controversies.

I don't understand why you are so concerned about what the Wikipedia says on the Grace Hu controversy when it rated a front page story in today's Long Beach Press-Telegram (Ethical issues dog Hu as Nov. election nears). When I looked up "Grace Hu" at Google, the very first link was to this page at the California Dept. of Corporations, "Permanently Barring Grace Hu from any Position of Management and Control of Any Escrow Agent".

As for coming "to some kind of an agreement": The Press-Telegram article includes Grace Hu's explanations, so you can include a paragraph on those explanations in the Cerritos, California#City Council Controversy section, and then properly cite the LB P-T article.

Also: Please note that you came close yesterday to violating the Three-revert rule that is part of the WIkipedia's Policies and guidelines. If you do four reverts in a 24 hour period, that can get you blocked or banned from editing on the Wikipedia. You should also know that continually doing only three reverts to try to avoid violating the 3RR rule can also get you sanctioned. ^Blank ^Verse 04:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come on! Please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, and please give a complete reason on the Cerritos talk page before making edits! Jumping cheese ^Contact 07:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this account a vandalism only account

In the two weeks that his acocunt has been active, the account's only contributions have been to delete useful, accurate, and well referenced information from the article Cerritos, California. It appears that this account belongs to either Grace Hu, or one of her friends/supporters, as the accurate and well referenced information is negative to Ms. Hu.

What is the process to declare this account a vandalism only account, so that it may be permanently blocked from editing on Wikipedia? --203.135.39.30 04:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Cerritos, California

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Cerritos, California, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jumping cheese ^Contact 03:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. vandalism

This is for 48 hours. Do not remove content without discussion and consensus on the relevant Talk page. Guy 08:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]