User talk:Public Kanonkas

April 2009

Sorry about that my mistake.Cheers Kyle1278 14:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! We all make mistakes. Best regards, --Public Kanonkas (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to me, all the articles about pornstars, harry poter books, internet domains, movie characters and sonic the hedgehog games that wikipedia is totally infested with are much, much more unconstructive than the rational criticism I have posted in the muslim article and of entirely non-encyclopedic content. So I think the reversion was kind of unfair, and was done only due to preserve the "political correctness" of the article (the thing religious leaders and politicians invented in order to remove critical thought from the masses)

It should also be noted that, I 've read all your articles about Islam, and there is nowhere mentioned anything about the ban on condoms, which causes an uncontrollable increase in earth population, and as a result, a severe contribution to global warming. Unless you point me out to at least one Muslim-related article that refers to this criticism, then the "Muslim" article violates the "neutral point of view" and is lacking content, and I demand at least this criticism to be restored. I also demand that criticism to be added also to a Chrisitian-related article.

Please see our neutral point of view policy. What you just posted now is not neutral at all. If you have further questions, please ask me if you want. Best regards, --Public Kanonkas (talk) 14:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism of my Talk Page. That particular IP vandal has been deleting warnings from his page and it has made enforcement rather dicey (in addition to their vandalism. LonelyBeacon (talk) 21:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect of Colossus of Rhodes

Editor Tbhotch claims that "Kanonkas" semi-protected Colossus of Rhodes. Would that be you?

If so, I was wondering why, and got nowhere when I questioned him about it. The article is not under attack nor is there persistent vandalism. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 23:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]