User talk:Public Concience

October 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Lizzie Cundy. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lizzy Cundy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lizzie Cundy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fæ (talk) 07:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lizzie Cundy. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are repeatedly adding a date of birth under discussion on the talk page. Until there is a consensus the information should not be re-added (see the WP:BLP guidelines). If you wish to justify inclusion then please gain a consensus on the talk page first. Fæ (talk) 09:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzie Cundy article

Hi, thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, your edits about the date of birth for Lizzie Cundy keep getting reverted as they weren't sourced. Information in articles, particularly those on living people should have references that substantiate that information. Those references should be in reliable sources so that we know its accurate. It isn't enough to have been to school with a subject, as wikipedia editors aren't reliable sources. The reason for these rules is to try and maintain credibility for the encyclopedia. You can get more info on this in the WP:VERIFY, WP:VNT and WP:TRUTH guidelines, or if you need to know more reply on my talk page. Hope that helps. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you just added again without a reference. Please stop it. If you need help in inserting references then tell me where it is and I can add it for you, but DO NOT add unreferenced material. Thanks. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lizzie Cundy, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for due to your edit warring and repeated re-insertion of completely unsourced "information", as you did at Lizzie Cundy. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact ArbCom at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Orange Mike | Talk 14:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]