Jump to content

User talk:Ptr123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ptr123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Pointe LaRoche 14:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Salem, Oregon

[edit]

You added an interesting tidbit to Salem, Oregon, but it is the wrong article. Wouldn't Jerusalem be a better place for that? —EncMstr 07:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tibet

[edit]

Hi, I see you seem to be in an edit dispute regarding if Tibet is part of East Asia, or part of Central Asia. It would be way more helpful if you were to discuss it (I've started a discusion here) than just reverting each other's edits. I hope we can work something that satisfies everbody.--Keithonearth (talk) 02:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oops, sorry I reverted that first compromise before you made your comment on the discussion page. My apologies. I answered you there.--Keithonearth (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhism and Taoism Face to Face

[edit]

Could you please provide the page number(s) for the material you provided to Taoism from this book? Thanks! Vassyana (talk) 16:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have immediate access to the book, though it's available locally to me. I'm sure given the subject of the book that quite a bit of it covers the topic. However, if you could just let me know the page numbers (preferably in the main body of the book, as opposed to the preface) where it specifically states that some suttas are based on earlier Taoist scriptures, that would be very helpful. Also, if it provides some specific examples, a quote or two would be great (also with page numbers). Thanks! Vassyana (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

[edit]

Hi there, nice to meet you.

I appreciate your contributions and I want to exchange some experiences. I have sent you an-email and I hope you will reply it soon. Thank you. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 23:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

821/822 Tibet/China peace treaty

[edit]

I see you still are editing controversial material without discussing it. I don't want to get into an edit war, but I was particularly disappointed with edit. It is a well known, and well referenced fact. (I have at least one book on my shelf that would be a solid reference for it) Your removing both the information and the reference wholesale shows a real disregard for having a balanced article. I wonder what could have been your reason for removing it, other than it's a fact that you find inconvenient. I also still see that you are still changing the Tibet Geographic description wholesale, without discussion, and after we had come to a compromise that expressed a number of opinions. Please discuss before making changes that could be controversial or I will have to revert your edits. --Keithonearth (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Keithonearth and Ptr123, just to be fair, I checked the editing history, Ptr123 did not remove the peace treaty, it looks like he just added a space in between of two paragraphs, that shows as he changed the whole paragraph to a space on editing history, which looks like he deleted the whole thing. But if you look one line below, the whole paragraph is there. Chadsnook (talk) 23:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful of the three-revert rule

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tibet. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Ptr123! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 299 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Mike Pace - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Christian Association has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing new article Christian Association. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christian Association for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

French language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Celtic
Noel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Irish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Dungan
Taoism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Sexuality

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Psychology of religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Anti-psychiatry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Will and Asylum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Laura Perls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankfurt University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gia-Fu Feng (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Santa Cruz and Free China
Integrative psychotherapy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Personality and Counselor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]