User talk:Psyden
Introducing the new WikiProject Cannabis!
[edit]Greetings!
I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Cannabis! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 559 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in the subject of cannabis.
- Browse the new WikiProject page
- Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system
Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Updating US Cannabis map on 9 Nov?
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Reconciling Legality of cannabis by country and Legal and medical status of cannabis?
[edit]Your feedback invited: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Reconciling_Legality_of_cannabis_by_country_and_Legal_and_medical_status_of_cannabis.3F
Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 02:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Psyden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Psyden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Psyden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Alexbrn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Medical Cannabis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Considering your history of misrepresenting sources, much more of this will find you at ANI with a topic ban being considered. Wikipedia is _not_ a venue for one-eyed cannabis advocacy. Alexbrn (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- What "history of misrepresenting sources" are you referring to Alexbrn ??
- Your editing record is public, and this is not the first time a source has been misrepresented to over-state the therapeutic benefits of cannabis.[1]. Please remember WP:V is a core policy and without it the integrity of the encyclopedia is jeopardised. It is particularly naughty to misrepresent paywalled sources as unless an editor with access to the text happens to check the content, misinformation slips into Wikipedia which is hard to clean up. Alexbrn (talk) 01:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- And you have mentioned nothing specific. Wikipedia has become a joke in the real world...bring it up in any serious discussion and you will be laughed at. It is because of people like you...people who have nothing more to do with their life than obsess themselves with the various nuances of wiki...maybe it makes you feel superior in some way. It is the reason I, and others, have stopped donating funds to this wiki experiment. Let it fade away.
- Being honest about what sources say is not "nuance". Alexbrn (talk) 12:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Wow, Alex, I looked at just the past couple of years on your talk page...it seems it is loaded with people accusing you of "edit warring". Perhaps we are not the "problem users"? And they are just the ones who took the time to post on your talk page (I didn't for example)...I'll bet there are many, many more instances. Psyden (talk) 12:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I get reported at WP:AN3 quite a lot.[2] It has never resulted in a sanction. The editors reporting me, on the other hand ... Alexbrn (talk) 12:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- I have been reported and it resulted in this. QuackGuru (talk) 01:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I get reported at WP:AN3 quite a lot.[2] It has never resulted in a sanction. The editors reporting me, on the other hand ... Alexbrn (talk) 12:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Wow, Alex, I looked at just the past couple of years on your talk page...it seems it is loaded with people accusing you of "edit warring". Perhaps we are not the "problem users"? And they are just the ones who took the time to post on your talk page (I didn't for example)...I'll bet there are many, many more instances. Psyden (talk) 12:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Being honest about what sources say is not "nuance". Alexbrn (talk) 12:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- And you have mentioned nothing specific. Wikipedia has become a joke in the real world...bring it up in any serious discussion and you will be laughed at. It is because of people like you...people who have nothing more to do with their life than obsess themselves with the various nuances of wiki...maybe it makes you feel superior in some way. It is the reason I, and others, have stopped donating funds to this wiki experiment. Let it fade away.
- Your editing record is public, and this is not the first time a source has been misrepresented to over-state the therapeutic benefits of cannabis.[1]. Please remember WP:V is a core policy and without it the integrity of the encyclopedia is jeopardised. It is particularly naughty to misrepresent paywalled sources as unless an editor with access to the text happens to check the content, misinformation slips into Wikipedia which is hard to clean up. Alexbrn (talk) 01:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
According to this the content in the article is inaccurate. Please work together to fix it. QuackGuru (talk) 12:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)